d profit ...
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kunal Khatua [mailto:kkha...@mapr.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:51 PM
> To: user@drill.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
>
> I also forgot to mention... within the drill-over
July 31, 2017 5:23 AM
To: user@drill.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
When is it right to add nodes vs adding CPUs? Since my installation is on AWS,
adding CPUs is relatively easy. When does it make sense to add nodes instead
of CPUs?
Dan Holmes | Revenue Analytics
Khatua [mailto:kkha...@mapr.com]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:51 PM
To: user@drill.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
I also forgot to mention... within the drill-override.conf, is a parameter
you'd need to set to constrain the async parquet reader's scan pool siz
hat the metrics in query
profile reveal.
-Original Message-
From: Jinfeng Ni [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:41 AM
To: user
Subject: Re: Drill performance tuning parquet
The number you posted seems to show that the query elapse time is highly
impacted by the
t;
> It is also possible that since you're running on AWS, the compute and
> storage layers and not as tightly coupled as Athena is with their own S3,
> which would make sense since they need an incentive for users to try Athena
> on their AWS infrastructure. :)
>
> Happy Drillin
hatua [mailto:kkha...@mapr.com]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 2:38 AM
To: user@drill.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
Look at the query profile's (in the UI) "operator profiles - overview"
section. The % Query Time is a good indicator of which operator co
e for users to try Athena on their AWS
infrastructure. :)
Happy Drilling!
-Original Message-
From: Dan Holmes [mailto:dhol...@revenueanalytics.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 6:23 PM
To: user@drill.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
Let's pretend there is on
; This is where you'll find more about this:
> https://drill.apache.org/docs/performance-tuning/
>
> ~ Kunal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Holmes [mailto:dhol...@revenueanalytics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:06 PM
> To: user@drill.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Dr
ut this:
> https://drill.apache.org/docs/performance-tuning/
>
> ~ Kunal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Holmes [mailto:dhol...@revenueanalytics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:06 PM
> To: user@drill.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parqu
Kunal
-Original Message-
From: Dan Holmes [mailto:dhol...@revenueanalytics.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:06 PM
To: user@drill.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drill performance tuning parquet
I did not partition the data when I created the parquet files (CTAS without a
PARITION BY)
H
I did not partition the data when I created the parquet files (CTAS without a
PARITION BY)
Here is the file list.
Thank you.
[dholmes@ip-10-20-49-40 sales_p]$ ll
total 1021372
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dholmes dholmes 393443418 Jul 27 19:05 1_0_0.parquet
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dholmes dholmes 321665234 Jul 27 19:06
11 matches
Mail list logo