Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill Release 1.16.0 - RC1

2019-04-22 Thread SorabhApache
*< Please disregard previous email, one of the link is not correct in it. Use the information in this email instead >* Hi Drillers, I'd like to propose the second release candidate (RC1) for the Apache Drill, version 1.16.0. Changes since the previous release candidate: DRILL-7185: Drill Fails

[VOTE] Apache Drill Release 1.16.0 - RC1

2019-04-22 Thread SorabhApache
Hi Drillers, I'd like to propose the second release candidate (RC1) for the Apache Drill, version 1.16.0. Changes since the previous release candidate: DRILL-7185: Drill Fails to Read Large Packets DRILL-7186: Missing storage.json REST endpoint DRILL-7190: Missing backward compatibility for REST

Re: Blocker on drill upgrade path

2019-04-22 Thread Nitin Pawar
Agreed. I will see what kind of alternative we can do on our side On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 2:53 PM Vova Vysotskyi wrote: > Hi Nitin, > > This behavior to allow aliases in a group by clause is driven by Calcite > and commonly used in other projects. > I think the workaround proposed by Aman is

Re: Blocker on drill upgrade path

2019-04-22 Thread Vova Vysotskyi
Hi Nitin, This behavior to allow aliases in a group by clause is driven by Calcite and commonly used in other projects. I think the workaround proposed by Aman is the best solution for this problem, since for example if you have several aggregate functions in the project for the same columns, it