engine to act on
> the basis of those modifications, you should call the modify() method.
> That
> seems to be true in the situation you're describing, from what I skim-read
> of your question.
>
> On 12/30/06, Sudha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>&g
Hi,
I have two objects in my domain. Customer and Item objects. Each item has a
unique item code. The goal is to group item objects based on the item code.
So, as soon as I receive an item from a customer, I run my rule to find out
2 things: 1) If the customer already has an item with the same it
Hi Michael,
Thanks for this wonderful explanation. It has cleared my doubts. With this
understanding, I can now try out some examples. I wish such explanation
becomes a part of the main stream documentation. It will help many beginners
like me.
Thanks,
Sudha
--
View this message in context
?
4. Also, in my second condition can I specify some more CEs like
$order: Order( (customer == $cust , (totalAmount > 500 ||
numberoforders < 400) )
Thanks,
Sudha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Help-on-writing-XML-rules-tf2880224.html#a8048347
Sent fro
like
(item.quantity < 1000 && item.duedateReached()) || (
item.quantity > 1000 && item.pendingdays()>10)
Is this possible in the version 3.0? If not, is there a build that would
provide me this?
Thanks,
Sudha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-use-Or-and
ify a single that has multiple
constrains using like OR, NOT etc.
Thanks,
Sudha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-Java-Conditions-have-multiple-contraints-tf2750235.html#a7673222
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabbl
in a List. Assuming that my
group object fires this rule at some particular time, following is my
question:
1. Would the rule apply to all Item objects in WM.
2. How can I accumulate these objects in a List?
Thanks,
Sudha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-accum