Re: Flink 1.3 - Checkpointing failing

If I read CompositeTypeSerializerConfigSnapshot ctor correctly: for (TypeSerializer nestedSerializer : nestedSerializers) { TypeSerializerConfigSnapshot configSnapshot = nestedSerializer.snapshotConfiguration(); this.nestedSerializersAndConfigs.add( The

Re: Flink 1.3 - Checkpointing failing

Your case doesn't seem like FLINK-5462 since there was no CancellationException in the stack trace you posted. The exception from TraversableSerializer.snapshotConfiguration() was added by FLINK-6178 FYI On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:04 PM, MAHESH KUMAR wrote: > Hi

Flink 1.3 - Checkpointing failing

Hi Team, We have some test cases written using StreamingMultipleProgramsTestBase It was working fine in version 1.2, we get the following error in version 1.3 It seems like CheckpointCoordinator fails after this error and Checkpointing no longer occurs. I came across this bug:

Cluster Memory Error

Hello, I am attempting to use the Flink runner to execute a data pipeline on a Hadoop cluster. The pipeline is created successfully in Flink, but when it attempts to execute the tasks, I receive a 'Size of total memory must be positive' error, despite having plenty of memory. Here's the log

Re: Checkpoints very slow with high backpressure

Nvm i found it. Backpressure caused by aws RDS instance of mysql. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Checkpoints-very-slow-with-high-backpressure-tp12762p13468.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing

Re: Fink: KafkaProducer Data Loss

I ran a few tests and was able to find the case where there won't be a data loss. And here's how the two tests are different. *The case where data loss is observed:* 1) Kafka source receives data. (Session window trigger hasn't been fired yet.) 2) Bring all Kafka brokers down. 3) Flink

Re: Checkpoints?

Thanks. Upgraded to 1.2.1 - problem goes away Steve On Jun 2, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Till Rohrmann > wrote: Hi Steve, in the past we had some problems with cleaning up old checkpoints. But this was in 1.1.x. These problems should be fixed by now.

FileSystem vs RocksDb backend

Hi All, If my states fit in the JVM heap, should I be using filesystem backend with HDFS instead of RocksDB ? Could someone comment on the FS vs RocksDb backend performance ? I’ve also heard that RocksDb backend is required to support delta checkpointing. Is this true ? Is delta checkpointing

Re: Queries regarding FlinkCEP

Hi Biplob, 1. The CEPPatternOperator can use either processing time or event time for its internal processing logic. It only depends on what TimeCharacteristic you have set for your program. Consequently, with event time, your example should be detected as an alert. 2. If you don't provide a

Re: Fink: KafkaProducer Data Loss

Thanks Till. The log files I have attached are the complete logs. They are DEBUG level. There are three files: jobManger.log, tmOne.log and tmTwo.log. -- View this message in context:

Re: Checkpoints?

Hi Steve, in the past we had some problems with cleaning up old checkpoints. But this was in 1.1.x. These problems should be fixed by now. Could you try upgrading to Flink 1.2.1 in order to see whether the problem persists? If this is the case, then it would be great if you could share the

Re: Fink: KafkaProducer Data Loss

Hi Ninad, After recovery, the job should continue from where the last checkpoint was taken. Thus, it should output all remaining messages at least once to Kafka. Could you share the complete JobManager and TaskManager logs with us? Maybe they contain some information which could be helpful to

Checkpoints?

Hi, Configuration: Flink 1.2.0 I'm using the Rocks DB backend for checkpointing. The problem I have is that no checkpoints are being deleted, and my disk is filling up. Is there configuration for this? Thanks Steve

Re: In-transit Data Encryption in EMR

Hi Vinay, I've pulled my colleague Gordon into the conversation who can probably tell you more about Flink's security features. Cheers, Till On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM, vinay patil wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I am looking into configuring in-transit data encryption

Re: Fink: KafkaProducer Data Loss

Thanks Gordon. *2017-06-01 20:22:44,400 WARN org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender - Got error produce response with correlation id 4 on topic-partit ion topic.http.stream.event.processor-0, retrying (9 attempts left). Error: NOT_ENOUGH_REPLICAS , not sure if this may be

Re: ProcessFunction gets elements out of order?

Hi, To answer your first question, yes, elements (can) arrive out-of-order and in most real-world use cases they will. Making them arrive in order can be prohibitively expensive because you have to buffer elements and then sort them when a watermark arrives. It’s possible to do this in custom

In-transit Data Encryption in EMR

Hi, Currently I am looking into configuring in-transit data encryption either using Flink SSL Setup or directly using EMR. Few Doubts: 1. Will the existing functionality provided by Amazon to configure in-transit data encrytion work for Flink as well. This is explained here:

Queries regarding FlinkCEP

Hi , Thanks a lot for the help last time, I have a few more questions and I chose to create a new topic as the problem in the previous topic was solved, thanks to useful inputs from Flink Community. The questions are as follows *1.* What time does the "within" operator works on "Event Time" or

Re: Gelly and degree filtering

Thanks for the suggestions, Yes I believe Ali is also looking for a more straight forward approach to access the degree of a vertex (i.e without creating a new dataset). But Martin and Vasias suggestions will work, so thanks again On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Nico Kruber

Re: Restoring Queryable State

Hi Philip, I don’t think that is possible right now. The main thing is that Flink currently doesn't store information about whether or not a registered state is queryable or not. So, it wouldn’t be queryable until a new StateDescriptor is provided for that state. Would you be able to know the

Re: Fink: KafkaProducer Data Loss

Hi Ninad, Unfortunately I don’t think the provided logs shed any light here. It does complain about: 2017-06-01 20:22:44,400 WARN  org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender - Got error  produce response with correlation id 4 on topic-partit  ion topic.http.stream.event.processor-0,

Re: Does job restart resume from last known internal checkpoint?

Thanks for that! Yes I indeed did not receive those emails. And my question is answered. Moiz On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Nico Kruber wrote: > Hi Moiz, > didn't Timo's answer cover your questions? > > see here in case you didn't receive it: >

Re: Does job restart resume from last known internal checkpoint?

Hi Moiz, didn't Timo's answer cover your questions? see here in case you didn't receive it: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ a1a0d04e7707f4b0ac8b8b2f368110b898b2ba11463d32f9bba73968@ %3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E Nico On Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:30:59 CEST Moiz S Jinia wrote: > Bump.. > >