+1 for dropping the MapR Fs.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Till Rohrmann
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 18:33
To: Martijn Visser
Cc: David Morávek ; dev ; Seth Wiesman
; User
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS
+1 for dropping the MapR FS.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed
+1 for dropping the MapR FS.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:11 AM Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it has no
> annotation at all. Given the circumstances that we thought that MapR was
> already dropped, I would
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it has no
annotation at all. Given the circumstances that we thought that MapR was
already dropped, I would propose to immediately remove MapR in Flink 1.15
instead of first marking it as deprecated and removing it in
+1, agreed with Seth's reasoning. There has been no real activity in MapR
FS module for years [1], so the eventual users should be good with using
the jars from the older Flink versions for quite some time
[1]
https://github.com/apache/flink/commits/master/flink-filesystems/flink-mapr-fs
Best,
+1 (what Seth said)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:15 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> +1
>
> I actually thought we had already dropped this FS. If anyone is still
> relying on it in production, the file system abstraction in Flink has been
> incredibly stable over the years. They should be able to use the
+1
I actually thought we had already dropped this FS. If anyone is still
relying on it in production, the file system abstraction in Flink has been
incredibly stable over the years. They should be able to use the 1.14 MapR
FS with later versions of Flink.
Seth
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:03 AM
Hi all,
Flink supports multiple file systems [1] which includes MapR FS. MapR as a
company doesn't exist anymore since 2019, the technology and intellectual
property has been sold to Hewlett Packard.
I don't think that there's anyone who's using MapR anymore and therefore I
think it would be
