big +1 from my side.
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 20:59, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 for the roadmap.
>
> Thanks Timo for driving this.
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 在 2021年3月4日，20:40，Timo Walther 写道：
> >
> > Last call for feedback on this topic.
> >
> > It seems everyone agrees to finally
big +1 from my side.
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 20:59, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 for the roadmap.
>
> Thanks Timo for driving this.
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 在 2021年3月4日，20:40，Timo Walther 写道：
> >
> > Last call for feedback on this topic.
> >
> > It seems everyone agrees to finally
+1 for the roadmap.
Thanks Timo for driving this.
Best,
Leonard
> 在 2021年3月4日，20:40，Timo Walther 写道：
>
> Last call for feedback on this topic.
>
> It seems everyone agrees to finally complete FLIP-32. Since FLIP-32 has been
> accepted for a very long time, I think we don't need another
+1 for the roadmap.
Thanks Timo for driving this.
Best,
Leonard
> 在 2021年3月4日，20:40，Timo Walther 写道：
>
> Last call for feedback on this topic.
>
> It seems everyone agrees to finally complete FLIP-32. Since FLIP-32 has been
> accepted for a very long time, I think we don't need another
Last call for feedback on this topic.
It seems everyone agrees to finally complete FLIP-32. Since FLIP-32 has
been accepted for a very long time, I think we don't need another voting
thread for executing the last implementation step. Please let me know if
you think differently.
I will start
Last call for feedback on this topic.
It seems everyone agrees to finally complete FLIP-32. Since FLIP-32 has
been accepted for a very long time, I think we don't need another voting
thread for executing the last implementation step. Please let me know if
you think differently.
I will start
Strong +1
Having two planners is confusing to users and the diverging semantics make
it difficult to provide useful learning material. It is time to rip the
bandage off.
Seth
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:54 AM Kurt Young wrote:
> change.>
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> First of all I want to thank you for
Strong +1
Having two planners is confusing to users and the diverging semantics make
it difficult to provide useful learning material. It is time to rip the
bandage off.
Seth
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:54 AM Kurt Young wrote:
> change.>
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> First of all I want to thank you for
Hi Timo,
First of all I want to thank you for introducing this planner design back
in 1.9, this is a great work
that allows lots of blink features to be merged to Flink in a reasonably
short time. It greatly
accelerates the evolution speed of Table & SQL.
Everything comes with a cost, as you
Hi Timo,
First of all I want to thank you for introducing this planner design back
in 1.9, this is a great work
that allows lots of blink features to be merged to Flink in a reasonably
short time. It greatly
accelerates the evolution speed of Table & SQL.
Everything comes with a cost, as you
10 matches
Mail list logo
