+1 from me as well.
> On 22. Jan 2019, at 10:47, aitozi wrote:
>
> +1 from my side, since we rely on this feature to implement the real state
> ttl .
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/
+1 from my side, since we rely on this feature to implement the real state
ttl .
--
Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/
Dear Flink users and developers!
I start this discussion to collect feedback about maintaining a custom
RocksDB branch for Flink, if anyone sees any problems with this approach.
Are there people who already uses a custom RocksDB client build with
RocksDB state backend?
As you might already know,
