Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state)

2016-12-15 Thread Dima Arbuzin
gt; *Subject:* Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to > the same state) > > The timeline is hard to predict to be honest. It depends a little bit on > how fast the community can proceed with these things. At the moment I'm > personally involved in other issues

Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state)

2016-10-11 Thread lgfmt
Thanks, Till. I will wait for your response. - LF From: Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> To: user@flink.apache.org; lg...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 2:49 AM Subject: Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state) The ti

Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state)

2016-10-11 Thread Till Rohrmann
t; > > -- > *From:* Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > *To:* user@flink.apache.org > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:13 AM > *Subject:* Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to > the same state) > > Hi Frank,

Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state)

2016-10-07 Thread lgfmt
uesday, September 20, 2016 7:13 AM Subject: Re: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state) Hi Frank, thanks for sharing your analysis. It indeed pinpoints some of the current CEP library's shortcomings. Let me address your points: 1. Lack of not op

Re: more complex patterns for CEP - Negation (was: CEP two transitions to the same state)

2016-09-17 Thread lgfmt
this be implemented? Thank you. - LF   From: Frank Dekervel <ker...@gmail.com> To: user@flink.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:04 PM Subject: more complex patterns for CEP (was: CEP two transitions to the same state) Hello, i did some more analysis wrt the problem i'm

CEP two transitions to the same state

2016-09-14 Thread Frank Dekervel
Hello, I'm trying to model a FSM using the flink CEP patterns. However, there is something i can't figure out as all the documentation examples are linear (either you go to the single possible next state, either no match). Suppose that two transitions lead from one state to two different states.