Re: Flink FsStatebackend is giving better performance than RocksDB

2020-07-19 Thread Yun Tang
From: David Anderson Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 19:34 To: Vijay Bhaskar Cc: user Subject: Re: Flink FsStatebackend is giving better performance than RocksDB You should be able to tune your setup to avoid the OOM problem you have run into with RocksDB. It will grow to use all of the memory

Re: Flink FsStatebackend is giving better performance than RocksDB

2020-07-18 Thread David Anderson
You should be able to tune your setup to avoid the OOM problem you have run into with RocksDB. It will grow to use all of the memory available to it, but shouldn't leak. Perhaps something is misconfigured. As for performance, with the FSStateBackend you can expect: * much better throughput and

Flink FsStatebackend is giving better performance than RocksDB

2020-07-17 Thread Vijay Bhaskar
Hi While doing scale testing we observed that FSStatebackend is out performing RocksDB. When using RocksDB, off heap memory keeps growing over a period of time and after a day pod got terminated with OOM. Whereas the same data pattern FSStatebackend is running for days without any memory spike