Yep!
Simple oversight, it was :/
Cheers,
Matyas
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:54 PM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hey!
> You are right, these fields could have been of the PodTemplate /
> PodTemplateSpec type (probably PodTemplateSpec is actually better).
>
> I think the reason why we used it is two fold:
Hey!
You are right, these fields could have been of the PodTemplate /
PodTemplateSpec type (probably PodTemplateSpec is actually better).
I think the reason why we used it is two fold:
- Simple oversight :)
- Flink itself "expects" the podtemplate in this form for the native
integration as you
Hi all,
Why does the FlinkDeployment CRD refer to the Pod class instead of the
PodTemplate class from the fabric8 library? As far as I can tell, the only
difference is that the Pod class exposes the PodStatus, which doesn't seem
mutable. Thanks in advance!
Best,
Mason
