Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

Ah I see, I'll have a look, thanks. Am Do., 23. Feb. 2023 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Gyula Fóra : > If you are interested in helping to review this, here is the relevant > ticket and the PR I just opened: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30786 >

Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

If you are interested in helping to review this, here is the relevant ticket and the PR I just opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30786 https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/535 Cheers, Gyula On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:10 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi! > > The

Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

Hi! The current array merging strategy in the operator is basically an overwrite by position yes. I actually have a pending improvement to make this configurable and allow merging arrays by "name" attribute. This is generally more practical for such cases. Cheers, Gyula On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at

Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

Hello, I noticed that if I set environment variables in both spec.podTemplate & spec.jobManager.podTemplate for the same container (flink-maincontainer), the values from the latter selectively overwrite the values from the former. For example, if I define something like this (omitting metadata