Re: Per Key Grained Watermark Support

2019-09-23 Thread Sameer Wadkar
apache.org > Date: Monday, Sep 23, 2019 19:56 > Subject: Re: Per Key Grained Watermark Support > > Hi > There was a discussion about this issue[1], as the previous discussion said > at the moment this is not supported out of the box by Flink, I think you can > try keyed process f

Re: Per Key Grained Watermark Support

2019-09-23 Thread bupt_ljy
Hi Congxian, Thanks but by doing that, we will lose some features like output of the late data. Original Message Sender: Congxian Qiu Recipient: Lasse Nedergaard Cc: 廖嘉逸; user@flink.apache.org; d...@flink.apache.org Date: Monday, Sep 23, 2019 19:56 Subject: Re: Per Key Grained Watermark

Re: Per Key Grained Watermark Support

2019-09-23 Thread Congxian Qiu
Hi There was a discussion about this issue[1], as the previous discussion said at the moment this is not supported out of the box by Flink, I think you can try keyed process function as Lasse said. [1]

Re: Per Key Grained Watermark Support

2019-09-22 Thread Lasse Nedergaard
Hi Jiayi We have face the same challenge as we deal with IoT unit and they do not necessarily share the same timestamp. Watermark or. Key would be perfect match here. We tried to workaround with handle late events as special case with sideoutputs but isn’t the perfect solution. My conclusion

Per Key Grained Watermark Support

2019-09-22 Thread 廖嘉逸
Hi all, Currently Watermark can only be supported on task’s level(or partition level), which means that the data belonging to the faster key has to share the same watermark with the data belonging to the slower key in the same key group of a KeyedStream. This will lead to two problems: 1.