Re: docker-flink images and CI

I'd be very happy if we had that integrated into our release process, yes. I'll see how much we can automate there. > On 15. Dec 2017, at 14:16, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > I agree with Patrick's (cc'd) comment from the linked issue. What I > understand from the linked issue is

Re: docker-flink images and CI

I agree with Patrick's (cc'd) comment from the linked issue. What I understand from the linked issue is that Patrick will take care of the Docker image update for 1.4 manually. Is that ok with you Patrick? :-) Regarding the Flink release process question: I fully agree with the idea to integrate

docker-flink images and CI

I created the following issue on here: https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink/issues/29 where it was suggested I should bring this up on the list. 1.4 has been released. Hurray! But there isn't yet a dockerfile / image for the release. Furthermore, it would be nice to have dockerfile /