specify its path
> for a specific execution to have a proper workaround ?
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ufuk Celebi [mailto:u...@apache.org]
> Envoyé : jeudi 3 décembre 2015 11:53
> À : user@flink.apache.org
> Objet : Re: HA Mode and standalone c
2015 11:11
À : user@flink.apache.org
Objet : Re: HA Mode and standalone containers compatibility ?
Hey Arnaud,
thanks for reporting this. I think Till’s suggestion will help to debug this
(checking whether a second YARN application has been started)…
You don’t want to run the batch application
nly 24 slots on my 48 container cluster !
-Message d'origine-
De : LINZ, Arnaud
Envoyé : jeudi 3 décembre 2015 11:26
À : user@flink.apache.org
Objet : RE: HA Mode and standalone containers compatibility ?
Hi,
The batch job does not need to be HA.
I stopped everything, cleaned the temp
Hi Arnaud,
as long as you don't have HA activated for your batch jobs, HA shouldn't
have an influence on the batch execution. If it interferes, then you should
see additional task manager connected to the streaming cluster when you
execute the batch job. Could you check that? Furthermore, could
h its own GUI despite the –m yarn-cluster option.
>
> De : Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
> Envoyé : jeudi 3 décembre 2015 10:36
> À : user@flink.apache.org
> Objet : Re: HA Mode and standalone containers compatibility ?
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> as long as you
und YARN properties file /tmp/.yarn-properties-voyager
Arnaud
De : Robert Metzger [mailto:rmetz...@apache.org]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 décembre 2015 14:03
À : user@flink.apache.org
Objet : Re: HA Mode and standalone containers compatibility ?
There is a configuration parameter called "yarn.pr
