Re: Re-keying / sub-keying a stream without repartitioning

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > I did spend some time thinking about this and we had the idea for a while > now to add an operation like “keyByWithoutPartitioning()” (name not final > ;-) that would allow the user to tell the system that we don’t

Re: Re-keying / sub-keying a stream without repartitioning

Hi Elias, sorry for the delay, this must have fallen under the table after Flink Forward. I did spend some time thinking about this and we had the idea for a while now to add an operation like “keyByWithoutPartitioning()” (name not final ;-) that would allow the user to tell the system that we

Re: Re-keying / sub-keying a stream without repartitioning

Anyone? On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Elias Levy wrote: > This is something that has come up before on the list, but in a different > context. I have a need to rekey a stream but would prefer the stream to > not be repartitioned. There is no gain to

Re-keying / sub-keying a stream without repartitioning

This is something that has come up before on the list, but in a different context. I have a need to rekey a stream but would prefer the stream to not be repartitioned. There is no gain to repartitioning, as the new partition key is a composite of the stream key, going from a key of A to a key of