Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 for dropping On 09/04/2015 11:04 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > +1 for dropping Hadoop 2.2.0 binary and source-compatibility. The > release is hardly used and complicates the important high-availability > changes in Flink. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Stephan Ewen

Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 for dropping Hadoop 2.2.0 binary and source-compatibility. The release is hardly used and complicates the important high-availability changes in Flink. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > I am good with that as well. Mind that we are not only dropping a

Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

I am good with that as well. Mind that we are not only dropping a binary distribution for Hadoop 2.2.0, but also the source compatibility with 2.2.0. Lets also reconfigure Travis to test - Hadoop1 - Hadoop 2.3 - Hadoop 2.4 - Hadoop 2.6 - Hadoop 2.7 On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Chiwan

Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

I think most cloud providers moved beyond Hadoop 2.2.0. Google's Click-To-Deploy is on 2.4.1 AWS EMR is on 2.6.0 The situation for the distributions seems to be the following: MapR 4 uses Hadoop 2.4.0 (current is MapR 5) CDH 5.0 uses 2.3.0 (the current CDH release is 5.4) HDP 2.0 (October 2013)

Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 to what Robert said. On Thursday, September 3, 2015, Robert Metzger wrote: > I think most cloud providers moved beyond Hadoop 2.2.0. > Google's Click-To-Deploy is on 2.4.1 > AWS EMR is on 2.6.0 > > The situation for the distributions seems to be the following: > MapR 4

Re: Usage of Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 for dropping Hadoop 2.2.0 Regards, Chiwan Park > On Sep 4, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > +1 to what Robert said. > > On Thursday, September 3, 2015, Robert Metzger wrote: > I think most cloud providers moved beyond Hadoop 2.2.0. > Google's