Re: [DISCUSS] RFC: Shipping Geode patch releases

2020-03-13 Thread Anthony Baker
Based on the consensus in this thread, we will move forward with this proposal. We can work out the exact mechanics after we release v1.12.0 and move that into a support mode. Thanks for all the feedback. Anthony On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:30 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd

Re: [DISCUSS] RFC: Shipping Geode patch releases

2020-02-24 Thread Alexander Murmann
Thanks for proposing this, Anthony! > I don’t think it’s necessary for this proposal to re-define or clarify > what constitutes a critical fix; it sounds like the bar would be the same > as the standard we already apply when back-porting to release branches > (proposal /w justification, and 3

Re: [DISCUSS] RFC: Shipping Geode patch releases

2020-02-21 Thread Owen Nichols
Thank you Anthony for proposing this “N-2” support policy. It isn’t a big change, but it is helpful to know that the Geode PMC will now be standing behind (and ready to vote on) patch releases within a 9-month window. Overall, this sounds much like how 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 started as community

[DISCUSS] RFC: Shipping Geode patch releases

2020-02-21 Thread Anthony Baker
Hi everyone, I'd like to propose shipping patch releases of Geode as a way to improve our engagement and support of our user community. Please review the details in the linked RFC [1] and kindly offer your thoughts in this thread. Thanks, Anthony [1]