Hi Ashish,
I am not sure if anyone is maintaining the calcite integration at the
moment. My guess is that the integration was limited in scope and probably
was only coded against replicated regions and probably only featured a
subset of OQL capability. I am not sure how difficult it would be to
Hi Stephen,
I am not sure how the cq operation is null. I tried to reproduce with a
test (not exactly the same and haven't been able to so far). The queries
themselves look like they should work. When populating the second region,
is the client cq just doing a put back to the server or is it
Hello Geode User List,
Here is a blog post about publishing metrics to Wavefront.
https://medium.com/@huynhja/publishing-apache-geode-metrics-to-wavefront-6e9a6cf5992b?sk=48d701092e02a711c7c924f14deec1fc
This time, with a companion video:
https://youtu.be/BDZh-FLkDTg
The source can be found
ks for sharing this.
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:53 AM Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
>> Please do share !!!
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:50 AM Anthony Baker wrote:
>>
>>> Nice! Yes, please continue to share!
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>&g
Hello Geode Users!
I wrote a blog/how-to about using the geode-kafka-connector (under
development) to connect Apache Kafka and Apache Geode.
https://medium.com/@huynhja/ingest-store-and-search-json-data-with-apache-kafka-and-apache-geode-fc6d0d2f9d9f
I'll continue to share blogs and such if
Great job Juan! Very informative and detailed read.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 4:43 AM Nabarun Nag wrote:
> Hi Geode Community,
>
> Please do visit the blog that Juan Ramos has put up on the OQL Method
> Authorizer :
>
>
Hi Evaristo,
I spoke with another committer, Anil, and from what we understand, this
process that is described would work. I am not sure if this it the
recommended way to do a restart but we believe the steps outlined would get
the intended outcome.
To clear a Serial gateway, I believe stopping
Hi Ashish,
Do you have custom code that connects spark to geode? I know there was a
geode-spark connector at one point and that it was forked:
https://github.com/Pivotal-Field-Engineering/geode-spark-connector (but
it looks like it hasn't been updated in awhile). Just curious if there was
www.gfi.world/>
>
> —
>
> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/gfiinformatique> [image:
> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/gfiinformatique> [image: Instagram]
> <https://www.instagram.com/gfiinformatique/> [image: LinkedIn]
> <https://www.linkedin.com/compan
Is the indexed data possibly represented by Strings instead of doubles or
floats? If so, you'd have to surround the value with single quotes.
If the indexed data is double, perhaps try adding a d to the value to
match, for example:
query --query='select * from /ksdata-benchmark where
The query tracing might have some bugs around it, I would guess this is the
case if you are getting the expected/correct results from the query itself..
The second case seems like a good fit for the join optimizations we made a
while back. I am not sure if the toString() is causing the
Not sure if this helps any, there used to be a Geode Spark Connector module
that was removed with ticket GEODE-194. I believe someone has
adopted/‘forked’ the code and maintaining it here:
https://github.com/Pivotal-Field-Engineering/geode-spark-connector
I think the connection with workers
er fetching it in server function. Now getting the query
> back fo 100K records in less than a second.
>
> Regards,
> Mags
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:02 PM, Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Just to be sure, are the two regions are colocated by productId?
Just to be sure, are the two regions are colocated by productId?
Looking at the provided query, what is the r alias? is it supposed to be
r1 or r2?
select sum(r.price.multiply(r.quantity)) from Region1 r1, Region2 r2
where r1.productId = r2.productId and r2.eventId = '123'
The index on
List:[Position [secId=OBJECTA]])
>
> struct(ID:3,linkedList:[Position [secId=OBJECTA]])
>
>
>
> Currently your output also confines with layout as (Map<ID,
> LinkedList>)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dharam
>
>
>
> *From:* Jason Huynh [mailtojhu...@piv
he issue is Option1 does not give right outcome as filter condition
> is not being applied.
>
> In real world, the actual object stored in geode itself is de normalized
> document. In my example "Dependencies grouped by service name"
>
> Now if I again have to write c
Correction, empd not empty, not sure how autocorrect came into play.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:48 AM Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> I just tried similar queries and get the following output
> Option1:
> struct(ID:1,linkedList:[ObjectA, ObjectB])
> struct(ID:1,l
In option1, are you receiving the linked list or is it not returning the
values at all?
Is the problem in option1 just a display issue?
For option2, you might be able to do a distinct with an order by but that
will force uniqueness in the tupling which you may not be looking for.
On Wed, Feb
Hi Vahram,
It would be interesting to know what object is not
serializing/deserializing correctly. Is there any chance you are passing
in function arguments that have had modifications that would impact
serialization that the class files on the server do not know about?
-Jason
On Wed, Jan 10,
This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the
create hash index apis.
Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not a traditional
hash look up index, but more of memory savings index. The index does not
store index keys in memory and must hash the keys every
Cool, creating an index will definitely help here. create an index on
userID
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:13 AM Amit Pandey
wrote:
> Yes Projection is a good idea.
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Amit Pandey
> wrote:
>
>> Its pretty
Adding to what Swapnil suggested, assuming you are only interested in a few
of the fields and not the entire object, try adding a projection field to
the query. This might improve performance as less data would need to be
serialized to a client.
I'd definitely try adding an index (some queries
;>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Dharam
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Anilkumar Gingade [mailto:aging...@pivotal.io]
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 05, 2017 2:35 AM
>> *To:* user@geode.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: IndexMaintenanceException while rem
gt; happen at this point, but it will help to know exactly how these objects
> are put and how they are updated and removed. Are they being modified at
> any point?
>
>
>
> What version are you currently using? I'm going to guess 1.0?
>
>
>
> Is there an actual domain
an entry value:
>- for small collections and read-only fat collections
> ADVANTAGE: no need to create a separate region
>
> We would track the metrics and automatically convert based on a
> combination of frequency of updates and size.
>
> We next define what a fat co
Hi Hitesh,
Not sure about everyone else, but I had a hard time reading this, however
I think I figured out what you were describing... the only part I still am
unsure about is Feedback/vote: both behaviour is desirable. Do you mean
you want feedback and voting on whether both behaviors are
t; Below syntax seems to be working even with ValueConstraint, but not sure
> if that’s the right way to define!
>
>
>
> Could you help me to verify that?
>
> cache-ref=*"geodeCache"*/>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Dharam
>
>
>
> *From:* Ja
Hi Dharam,
Would you be able to provide more information? From the provided code, I
am unable to determine why/how a duplicate create event is being sent. It
doesn't look like that should be happening. Is there a reason why you are
removing the value in the cqListener? I would assume that
28 matches
Mail list logo