Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

Based on some other recent discussions about the Redis adaptor, I would agree this makes sense. I don't believe its usage has been well tested or proven yet by its intended audience. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan wrote: > I'm going to go ahead and

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there are no objections. On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. -Dan On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > +1 to marking it experimental now > > Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking > changes to it if we need to. > > --

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1. Good to know. I was just talking to a potential customer this morning that’s intent on replacing voldemort with an IMDG and wanting to merge whatever solution with their current Redis use cases. If its not ready I want to make sure I’m not giving bad information. Wayne Lund Advisory