org"
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 4:21 AM
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire BKJM from trunk?
Yes, We can remove from trunk and can be deprecated in branch-2. We confirmed
with all the existing customers on this..
--Brahma Reddy Battula
-Original Message-
From: Gangumalla, Um
: d...@bookkeeper.apache.org; Uma gangumalla; Vinayakumar B;
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; user@hadoop.apache.org; u...@bookkeeper.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire BKJM from trunk?
For Huawei, Vinay/Brahma should know about their usage. I think after QJM
stabilized and ready they also
If I remember correctly, Huawei also adopted QJM component. I hope @Vinay
might have discussed internally in Huawei before starting this e-mail
discussion thread. I'm +1, for removing the bkjm contrib from the trunk
code.
Also, there are quite few open sub-tasks under HDFS-3399 umbrella jira,
whic
+ Rakesh and Uma
Rakesh and Uma might have a better idea on this. I think Huawei was using
it when Rakesh and Uma worked there.
- Sijie
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> I recommend including the BookKeeper community in this discussion. I’ve
> added their user@ and dev@
I recommend including the BookKeeper community in this discussion. I’ve added
their user@ and dev@ lists to this thread.
I do not see BKJM being used in practice. Removing it from trunk would be
attractive in terms of less code for Hadoop to maintain and build, but if we
find existing users t
