Yes, HBASE-4510 broke running on one set of conditions, now the fix
in HBASE-4680 seems to have broken another.
Are the safe mode related changes from HBASE-4510 really necessary
right now? Would it be possible to wait for HDFS-2413, when we have a
real API for checking safe mode? Or do we
Hi
What I would suggest is try doing a forcefull assign of that region that is
showing this log using the shell.(If the logs still continues to appear).
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: tovb...@gmail.com [mailto:tovb...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Matthew
Tovbin
Sent: Monday,
Matthew,
What did you set your max region size to be for this table?
14K files totalling 650GB means you have a lot of small files...
On average ~45MB (rough calc).
How many regions? Do you have mslabs set up?
(GC tuning?)
Sorry for jumping in on the end of this conversation.
-Mike
From:
I am testing Hbase 0.90.4 with Hadoop 0.20.205. But we are no where near to
production.
However I noticed the integration is pretty stable.
-Jignesh
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Francis Christopher Liu
francis...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We're interested in deploying Hbase with
Mike, thanks for responding.
BTW, I have a small update. I succeeded opening the table by setting
hbase.master.assignment.timeoutmonitor.timeout to 1 hour.
Now the table is hosted on single region server which is bad (see status
below). Should I compact the table and then split it?
What did
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Francis Christopher Liu
francis...@rocketmail.com wrote:
We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
environment. Has anyone tried sizable deployments of hbase with Hadoop
0.20.205? What are your experiences?
I've run it in testing
Which version would you guys recommend for .205 hadoop: 0.92, or 0.90.4?
On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:23:52AM, Stack wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Francis Christopher Liu
francis...@rocketmail.com wrote:
We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
environment.
Hi Guys -
This is a fairly complete little Tool (Configured) whose purpose is to move out
a whole slew of regions into a backup directory and restore .META. when done.
We found that we needed to do this when a huge volume of keys had been
generated into a production table, and it turned out
attached is my original email to the list, which contains code for a tool to
repair your hole in .META.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Smith [mailto:stu24m...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:39 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: PENDING_CLOSE for too long
Hello
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David Capwell dcapw...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Which version would you guys recommend for .205 hadoop: 0.92, or 0.90.4?
0.92 is not out yet (Hopefully an RC will go up this week) so that
leaves you with 0.90.4.
St.Ack
I backed out hbase-4680. I made HBASE-4708 to backout the safemode
parts of hbase-4510. Any chance of a patch Harsh?
Thanks,
St.Ack
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Harsh J ha...@cloudera.com wrote:
Gary,
We can revert for now, yes. Todd had fixed the constant name change
issue earlier, so
Mike, thanks for responding.
BTW, I have a small update. I succeeded opening the table by setting
hbase.master.assignment.timeoutmonitor.timeout to 1 hour.
Now the table is hosted on single region server which is bad (see status
below). Should I compact the table and then split it?
What did
Ram,
Like I mentioned below the region is up, thanks to
hbase.master.assignment.timeoutmonitor.timeout
setting. Though, it still located on a single region server. How do I split
it?
Hi
What I would suggest is try doing a forcefull assign of that region that
is
showing this log using the
Thanks for the responses.
Does .90.4 support .205 out of the box or would it need patches?
Also how many nodes did the cluster have?
On Oct 31, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David Capwell dcapw...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Which version
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Francis Liu francis...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the responses.
Does .90.4 support .205 out of the box or would it need patches?
Also how many nodes did the cluster have?
No need of patches for 0.90.4. My test cluster was 15 nodes.
St.Ack
Thanks Geoff. Mind making a JIRA and attaching the code as a patch?
Copying and pasting from email might not work so well. Thanks boss,
St.Ack
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Geoff Hendrey ghend...@decarta.com wrote:
Hi Guys -
This is a fairly complete little Tool (Configured) whose
Hi,
HBASE-4552 has been integrated to 0.92 and TRUNK.
From Jonathan:
I was leaning towards either
1) deprecating and keeping the old methods in it in (keeping old rpc
version)
2) having a patch available but in not including in an official 0.90 since
it breaks compatibility
Basically if we use
Basically if we use the approach in HBASE-4552, rolling restart wouldn't work.
-1 to an approach that has this outcome.
IMO, rolling restart must always be possible on a minor version upgrade.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
Here is an example of something that might work: http://pastebin.com/t9Bbe1F6
My understanding is if you add methods at the end of an interface definition,
the interface will remain compatible with a client compiled against the earlier
version.
This is based on our 0.90-ish internal branch so
I was able to get tests HBASE-4552 specific running on 0.90.x with Andrew's
patch to 0.90 with a minor tweak to the HFile instantiation code and with a
backport of HBASE-3316 (allows Pair to be serialized and sent across the
RPC protocol).
Jon.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Purtell
Why would you use HBase for that?
Regarding your two questions:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:17 PM, xtliwen xtli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
When the client visit the video of a website through my website, it will be
transcoded with our video codec server.As the time goes on,the
It would be nice to have a patch for 0.90.4 also.
Thanks,
-Jack
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:49 AM, stack (Updated) (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated
I would like to save the data using hbase.The hbase is designed for small
data,such as log.Maybe the video is too large for a
row,so I am worried about the performance of the hbase in storing the video
data.
2011-11-01
xtliwen
发件人： Jean-Daniel Cryans
发送时间： 2011-11-01 08:07:02
收件人：
You are right,100M is too big ,so I plan to split the video to multi parts(avg
5M ), and save in different colums.
2011-11-01
xtliwen
发件人： Doug Meil
发送时间： 2011-11-01 09:54:47
收件人： user@hbase.apache.org
抄送：
主题： Re: save video with hbase
Hi there, see...
24 matches
Mail list logo
