Please take a look at dfs.datanode.data.dir in hdfs-site.xml.
P.S. hbase.local.dir supports one dir only, don't specify it with a list:)
Thanks,
发件人: Tao Xiao [xiaotao.cs@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年12月20日 15:11
收件人: user
主题: Should we set the property
Since hbase.local.dir specifes local directory, why doesn't it specify
multiple directories on different disks to spread I/O, just as what
dfs.datanode.data.dir does ?
2013/12/20 谢良 xieli...@xiaomi.com
Please take a look at dfs.datanode.data.dir in hdfs-site.xml.
P.S. hbase.local.dir supports
maybe you have a misunderstanding about hbase.local.dir, please refer to
HBASE-6824 for why it was introduced.
Thanks,
发件人: Tao Xiao [xiaotao.cs@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年12月20日 16:30
收件人: user
主题: Re: 答复: Should we set the property hbase.local.dir to a
Hbase uses HDFS for data storage and region servers just use HDFS API to
write files. So you should be looking at balancing disk IO at datanode
level (dfs.datanode.data.dir as mentioned in other response). The path you
mentioned (hbase.local.dir) is just used for storing temporary files or
Barath's respons is a good summary.
There almost nothing going into hbase.local.dir. It's like in your local
linux box. You don't specify more than one tmp directory. It's the same
thing here. There will not be really any benefit of adding that.
2013/12/20 Bharath Vissapragada
Just curious !!! has anybody started using hbase-0.96.1.1 with hadoop 2.x?
How stable it is?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Elliott Clark ecl...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks.
Should we now go remove the 0.96.1 release from mirrors ?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Hsieh
... I assume you mean the latest hdfs versions... Since hbase 96 doesn't run on
YARN container nodes yet. (See Hoya project which aims to port it over).
While were on the subject... @steve which version of hbase is expected to
contain the Hoya stuff?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 20, 2013, at
Hi Jignesh,
I'm running 0.96.1.1 on Hadoop 2.2.0. So far I have not seen anything
wrong. But it's not yet a production cluster.
JM
2013/12/20 Jay Vyas jayunit...@gmail.com
... I assume you mean the latest hdfs versions... Since hbase 96 doesn't
run on YARN container nodes yet. (See Hoya
} catch (IOException e) {
LOG.error(Encountered unrecoverable error from region server, e);
The IOException came from region server. During execution of
LoadIncrementalHFiles, there would be some error on region server.
Cheers
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Tao Xiao
You need the following:
htrace-core-2.04.jar
Cheers
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Biju G.S Nair bijun...@acm.org wrote:
Tried to run a simple program using 0.96 Hadoop2 against Hadoop 2 cluster
and getting errors about some cloudera class not found. Following are the
details. Which
Steve is on vacation.
bq. which version of hbase is expected to contain the Hoya stuff?
HBase and Hoya are separate projects.
You can use 0.96.1.1 tar ball in Hoya deployment.
Cheers
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Jay Vyas jayunit...@gmail.com wrote:
... I assume you mean the latest hdfs
To all:
Thank you all.
Now I understand how to set hbase.local.dir and the reason
2013/12/20 Jean-Marc Spaggiari jean-m...@spaggiari.org
Barath's respons is a good summary.
There almost nothing going into hbase.local.dir. It's like in your local
linux box. You don't specify
12 matches
Mail list logo
