Re: [DISCUSS] Separate Git Repository for HBCK2

2018-07-24 Thread Umesh Agashe
Thanks Stack, Josh and Andrew for your suggestions and concerns. I share Stack's suggestions. This would be similar to hbase-thirdparty. The new repo could be hbase-hbck/hbase-hbck2. As this tool will be used by hbase users/ developers, hbase JIRA can be used for hbck issues. bq. How often does

Re: [DISCUSS] Separate Git Repository for HBCK2

2018-07-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
If we do this can we also move out hbck version 1? It would be really weird in my opinion to have v2 in a separate repo but v1 shipping with the 1.x releases. That would be a source of understandable confusion. I believe our compatibility guidelines allow us to upgrade interface annotations from

Re: confusing heartbeats.

2018-07-24 Thread Stack
I tried backporting the patch to branch-1. There just a few rejects. Would you be up for creating a backport issue and attaching a version of this patch that fit branch-1? Thanks, S On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:12 PM Kang Minwoo wrote: > Hello, Users > > Our filter is row key filter. So scan time

Re: Adding same row filter multiple times

2018-07-24 Thread Biplob Biswas
Thanks, I checked both HBASE-19008 and HBASE-15410, and understood the reasons why it was changed back to a list from a set. For now, what I am doing to not bloat up my filterlist is to create sets which store the row keys so that the duplicates are eliminated, and then use the set result to