Thanks Stack. Few comments.
> Have you put much work into it? If you went to HBASE-10156, write
> throughput is better again and you'd be on same system as is in current
> hbase-1.x so would be easier to help you.
>
Good to know, 1.x move is planned soonish so will wait for it.
> > Since
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Shrijeet
wrote:
> Thanks Stack. Few comments.
>
>
> > Have you put much work into it? If you went to HBASE-10156, write
> > throughput is better again and you'd be on same system as is in current
> > hbase-1.x so would be easier
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Shrijeet
wrote:
> HBase Version: 0.94.26
> HDFS version: 2.5.x
>
> We backported HBASE-8755 onto 0.94.27
Have you put much work into it? If you went to HBASE-10156, write
throughput is better again and you'd be on same system as
HBase Version: 0.94.26
HDFS version: 2.5.x
We backported HBASE-8755 onto 0.94.27 and seeing a corner case that I wish
to run by the list. In one of the write heavy use cases we noticed region
server hanging forever (all server handlers busy on HLog.sync plus few
other odd things). From logs we