Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms

2013-07-11 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Are those incremented cells? J-D On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Patrick Schless patrick.schl...@gmail.com wrote: I have had replication running for about a week now, and have had a lot of data flowing to our slave cluster over that time. Now, I'm running the verifyrep MR job over a 1-hour

Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms

2013-07-11 Thread Patrick Schless
It's possible, but I'm not sure. This is a live system, and we do use increment, and it's a smaller portion of our writes into HBase. I can try to duplicate it, but I can't say how these specific cells got written. Would incremented cells not get replicated correctly? On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at

Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms

2013-07-11 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Yeah increments won't work. I guess the warning isn't really visible but one place you can see it is: $ ./bin/hadoop jar ../hbase/hbase.jar An example program must be given as the first argument. Valid program names are: CellCounter: Count cells in HBase table completebulkload: Complete a

Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms

2013-07-11 Thread lars hofhansl
@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:44 PM Subject: Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms Yeah increments won't work. I guess the warning isn't really visible but one place you can see it is: $ ./bin/hadoop jar ../hbase/hbase.jar An example program must

Re: Replication - some timestamps off by 1 ms

2013-07-11 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Yeah verifyrep is a pretty basic tool, there's tons of room for improvement. For the moment I guess you can ignore the 8 bytes cells that aren't printable strings. Feel free to hack around that MR job and maybe contribute back? The use case for which I built it had loads of tables and the ones