Re: Setting TTL at the row level

Thanks guys for the replies, I missed the cell level TTL feature! Josh On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Anoop John wrote: > Yes we have per cell level TTL setting from 0.98.9 release onwards. > That should be the best way for ur usecase. > See Mutation#setTTL(long) > >

Re: Setting TTL at the row level

Yes we have per cell level TTL setting from 0.98.9 release onwards. That should be the best way for ur usecase. See Mutation#setTTL(long) -Anoop- On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, yonghu wrote: > I did not quite understand what you mean by "row timestamp"? As far as I >

Re: Setting TTL at the row level

I did not quite understand what you mean by "row timestamp"? As far as I know, timestamp is associated to each data version (cell). Will you store multiple data versions in a single column? On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Why not using

Re: Setting TTL at the row level

Why not using the cell level ttl? Le 2017-06-21 2:35 PM, "Vladimir Rodionov" a écrit : > Should work > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:31 AM, wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I know it is possible to set TTL in HBase at the column family level - > > which

Re: Setting TTL at the row level

Should work On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:31 AM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I know it is possible to set TTL in HBase at the column family level - > which makes HBase delete rows in the column family when they reach a > certain age. > > Rather than expire a row after it's reached a

Setting TTL at the row level

Hi all, I know it is possible to set TTL in HBase at the column family level - which makes HBase delete rows in the column family when they reach a certain age. Rather than expire a row after it's reached a certain age, I would like to expire each specific row at a specific time in the future