Gotcha.
Columns are quite dynamic in my case, but since I need to fetch rows first
anyways; a KeyOnlyFilter to first find them and then overwrite values will
do just fine.
Cheers,
-Kristoffer
I didn't mean to set the version to null, I meant to include a revision of
the column whose contents are empty. This empty revision will Still be
returned by any gets on that row, but you can put code into your client
that treats empty values as deleted.
It's a bit of a hack, but it's the best I c
Ted: Awesome. I can think of several use cases where this is useful, but im
pretty stuck on 0.92 right now.
I tried the null-version trick but must be doing something wrong. How do I
set version to null on a column? Isnt version equal to the timestamp
(primitive long)?
Setting timestamp to 0 and
That's right.
In HBase 0.94 and trunk, check out the following API in HRegion:
public void mutateRowsWithLocks(Collection mutations,
Collection rowsToLock) throws IOException {
It allows you to combine Put's and Delete's for a single region, atomically.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:22 PM, K
Thanks, sounds like that should do it.
So im guessing it is correct to assume that _all_ KeyValues added to a
_single_ Put operation will either wholely succeed or wholely fail as long
as they belong to the same row?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
> I don't think you can incl
I don't think you can include a delete with a put and keep it atomic.
You could include a null version of the column with your put, though,
for a similar effect.
--Tom
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kristoffer Sjögren wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to use Put operations to replace ("set") already
Hi
I'm trying to use Put operations to replace ("set") already existing rows
by nullify certain columns and qualifiers as part of an Put operation.
The reason I want to do this is 1) keep the operation atomic/consistent 2)
avoid latency from first doing Delete then Put.
Is there some way to do t
