Releasing HBase 3 snapshots off master would be fine by me.
> On Jan 3, 2020, at 7:37 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> A while back I offered to start making hbase 3 alpha releases so we had
> something we could all refer to in test environments. That offer still
> stands.
>
>
> I personally
A while back I offered to start making hbase 3 alpha releases so we had
something we could all refer to in test environments. That offer still
stands.
I personally would still rather those releases be off of the master branch
because we still have too many branches given our tooling for
Why not start a branch-3 and begin SNAPSHOT releasing of this branch right now?
+1 to dropping Hadoop 2 support in HBase 3. We need the major increment to make
this kind of change, let’s take the opportunity.
Regarding Hadoop 2, the discussion I have seen indicates Hadoop thinks it will
be
I personally like having Hadoop 2 support still, but I agree the cadence
out of Hadoop has been problematic.
I would prefer we not change the state of Hadoop support in the master
branch until we have a release plan of some kind for HBase 3. I'd rather
that be sooner rather than later.
On Fri,
Support Hadoop 2.x in 3.0.0 means we need to carry it over the whole 3.x
release lines, which seems to be a problem since the Hadoop community do
not want to new 2.x release line any more...
Nick Dimiduk 于2020年1月4日 周六06:55写道：
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
> wrote:
>
> > We
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which does not
> have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop 2.x.
>
Indeed there is no formal release plan for HBase-3.0, but I hope it's
sooner than 2+
All Regions or just the one?
Do thread dumps lock thread reading against hdfs every time you take one?
Is it always inside in updateReaders? Is there a bad file or lots of files
to add to the list?
Yours,
S
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 8:34 PM Kang Minwoo wrote:
> Hello Users,
>
> I met an issue
