Hi Lee,

When I started to work on Hive around 4 years ago, MR was already set as
deprecated. So you definitely should scan even older archives.

For Iceberg integration, it would be good to have more frequent releases
for Hive as well.

Thanks, Peter



Lee Ming-Ta <lmtc1...@hotmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. febr. 24., Sze
4:34):

> Dear all,
>
> I probably didn't follow that much and would like to ask if anyone can
> point me to some resources about the reason to remove MR?
> Or what kine of keyword to search on Google?
>
> Thank you very much! Wish everyone a happy Lunar New Year.
>
> ------------------------------
> *寄件者:* Mass Dosage <massdos...@gmail.com>
> *寄件日期:* 2021年2月23日 下午 09:49
> *收件者:* d...@hive.apache.org <d...@hive.apache.org>
> *副本:* Michel Sumbul <michelsum...@gmail.com>; user@hive.apache.org <
> user@hive.apache.org>
> *主旨:* Re: Any plan for new hive 3 or 4 release?
>
> I would love to see a HIve 3.1 release which is capable of being used on
> Java 11 like Hive 2 is.
>
> What is the main difference going to be between Hive 3 and 4? The removal
> of MR?
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 16:46, Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> wrote:
>
> Hey Michel!
>
> Yes it was a long time ago we had a release; we have quite a few new
> features in master.
> I think we are scaring people for some time now that we will be dropping
> MR support...I think we should do that.
>
> I would really like to see a new Hive release in the near future as well -
> there is no way for users to even try out new features.
> I was planning to add nightly builds to package the latest master's state
> into a deployable artifact - I think a service like may help pretest our
> next release; I think it
> won't take much to do it so I'll probably throw it together in the next
> couple days!
>
> cheers,
> Zoltan
>
> On 2/21/21 2:27 PM, Michel Sumbul wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > If I'm not wrong, the last release of Hive 3.x is 18 months old.
> > I wanted to ask if you had any roadmap / plan to release a new version of
> > Hive 3.x or Hive 4?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Michel
> >
>
>

Reply via email to