Re: Apache Ignite 1.4.0 released

Now it's clear. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-4-0-released-tp1541p1642.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Apache Ignite 1.4.0 released

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:59 PM, myset wrote: > Some folder packages are missing from fabric 1.4.0 binary distribution (Ex. > ignite-schedule, ignite-hibernate) > These are LGPL-based dependencies. They conflict with Apache 2.0 license and cannot be included by default into Apache binary release

Re: Apache Ignite 1.4.0 released

Some folder packages are missing from fabric 1.4.0 binary distribution (Ex. ignite-schedule, ignite-hibernate) -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-4-0-released-tp1541p1640.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at

Re: Using JCache implementation of Ignite

stallapp wrote > My requirement is Distributed Client-Server Cache: Multiple cache > (clustered) nodes, collaborating in a distributed fashion and executing in > isolation from the client application. > Is this possible with Ignite? Could someone refer me Ignite docs or code > samples related to th

Re: Apache Ignite 1.4.0 released

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:14 AM, myset wrote: > Thank you for great work, > Thanks! > One question Dmitry... Why don't you include all optional packages in > 1.4.0 build ? If it's not very hard to do , please include it into build > script all that optional packages from sources. > I am not

Re: Getting IllegalStateException: Cache has been closed or destroyed: cache

Humm not sure... it seems consistent to one node. if I can figure it out I'll post more info. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Getting-IllegalStateException-Cache-has-been-closed-or-destroyed-cache-tp1631p1637.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users

Re: Apache Ignite 1.4.0 released

Thank you for great work, One question Dmitry... Why don't you include all optional packages in 1.4.0 build ? If it's not very hard to do , please include it into build script all that optional packages from sources. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.co

Re: Using JCache implementation of Ignite

Hi, Please properly subscribe to the user list by sending an email to "user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org" and following the instructions in the reply. This way everyone in the community will get notified whenever you post questions. The answers to your questions are positive. Please find the doc

Re: Getting IllegalStateException: Cache has been closed or destroyed: cache

Is that possible to reproduce this issue? If yes, what is the simplest way to do that? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, javadevmtl wrote: > Using 1.4.0, I have 4 nodes all running with -Xmx100g and it deems one node > keeps going down with > > I have 32,000,000 total records in the cache not

Re: Can Apache Ignite be used in production Environment?

Hi, Sridhar, in addition to that Dmitriy said, a couple of resources describing the difference between community & enterprise editions: http://www.gridgain.com/download/ http://www.gridgain.com/resources/feature-comparisons/ On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:22 PM, sridhar77 wrote: > Hi dsetrakyan, > >

RE: ?

Hello Ivan Many thanks for great news. We start to prototype ☺ jaro From: Ivan Veselovskiy [mailto:iveselovs...@gridgain.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 7:47 PM To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: ? Hi, Jaroslav, In my understanding, with Ignite the answers to all the questions are in

Getting IllegalStateException: Cache has been closed or destroyed: cache

Using 1.4.0, I have 4 nodes all running with -Xmx100g and it deems one node keeps going down with I have 32,000,000 total records in the cache not including the downed node. SEVERE: Unhandled exception java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cache has been closed or destroyed: cache at org.a

Re: Can Apache Ignite be used in production Environment?

Hi dsetrakyan, I have already subscribed but not sure why it says, message is not posted to the user iist. Anyway thanks for your response. Customers who are using apache ignite are not provided in the apache ignite website. So, I assume that they should be GridGain customers. But, still it wo

Re: Single key with multiple values or multi map?

Ok thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Single-key-with-multiple-values-or-multi-map-tp1618p1629.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.