Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for looking at this. I will create a reproducer for you.
Thanks,
Gordon.
From: Mikhail Cherkasov [mailto:mcherka...@gridgain.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 July 2017 2:14 AM
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: Re: IGNITE-4548 does not seem to be completely fixed
Hi Gordon,
Could you
Hi Pavel,
Yes that’s correct, in this case we were calling
Ignite.GetServices().GetServiceProxy() every second.
When the .NET client is remote from the java server, this caused a large amount
of traffic. As service descriptors for services that were not even deployed (so
basically all the
Hi Alex,
Thanks.
i have changed the swapiness to avoid sys time > user time. and did test
but no luck.
What do you mean by "apps/containers running on same physical machine" ?
You mean on kube instance ? if yes, yes there are number of
services/containers running on same kube cluster/instance.
Then it might be blocked by firewall. These messages simply mean that client
can't establish connection with this socket address.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-to-remote-host-from-client-gives-error-tp14395p1.html
Sent from
Srini,
Please refer to [1] for information on how to use the store and
configuration examples.
If default port is not 9042, then I don't see an issue. You have to either
explicitly specify your default port, or provide all addresses as host:port
strings.
[1]
Hi Rishi,
seems it's not a good idea to connect ignite repeatedly, I observed a
similar memory issue.
would you mind to share your server configurations (cores, memory)?
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-1-6-0-suspected-memory-leak-from-DynamicCacheDescriptor-td9443i20.html
Thank you.. Val for all your help.
I will investigate further..
We are monitoring ignite every 5 mins with shell script could that cause memory
to go high ?
Take Care,
Rishi
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 4:50 PM, vkulichenko [via Apache Ignite Users]
> wrote:
>
>
Hi!
What Ignite version do you use?
Also attach server and clients nodes configuration.
We will try to reproduce.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/cache-partitions-tp14063p14440.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at
What version of ignite are you using?
May be Docker will be more suitable for you?
See: https://apacheignite-tools.readme.io/docs/docker-deployment
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-web-console-tp13659p14439.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite
Yes I do have a server nodes which is hosted on this ip address port
10.133.71.210:47500", I have run it by running ignite.sh.
It does not seem to be working. Any idea?
-Abhishek
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:24 AM, vkulichenko
wrote:
> You're starting a client node
Cached data change notifications are used in multiple use-cases. Here is one
-
We have OFFHEAP distributed Ignite cache fronted by JVM level local copy. It
is similar to what Near cache would work. However, Ignite Near cache (JVM
level local copy) also get serialized/de-serialized. which results
Hi Val,
Yes, Cassandra listening to port other than 9042.
Yes, I'm following the the tests approach. Should I explicitly create
cache configuration at runtime
and set it to the ignite instance?
Looking at the hibernate example, cache config instance is created with
in. Should I
Hi Czeslaw,
Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty
email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.
cszczotka wrote
> I’m using cache with
You're starting a client node and it connect to server cluster. Do you have
any server nodes?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-to-remote-host-from-client-gives-error-tp14395p14434.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing
Hi,
Please take a look and play with examples provided by Ignite:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/computegrid
They show how to do this kind of basic operations.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
What exactly is consuming the memory? Do you have a heap dump?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-2-0-vs-Ignite-1-7-or-later-tp14401p14432.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sam,
What is the business use case behind this?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Event-Listeners-tp8306p14431.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Tom,
It sounds like these jobs are triggered pretty frequently. So why not create
a small application that will create an embedded client once and also have
an internal timer or cron based scheduler to execute jobs periodically. You
can do the topology check within this application as well,
iostream wrote
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 caches, each with POJO values that look like -
>
> public class Value1 {
>
> @QuerySqlField(index = true)
> private Long a;
>
> @QuerySqlField(index = true)
> private String b;
>
> }
>
> public class Value2 {
>
>
Hi,
Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty
email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.
--
View this message in context:
Priya,
There are no configuration properties that can be changed in runtime.
However, most of your requirements seem to be related to dynamic schema
change. This already happens transparently on object level thanks to binary
format [1] used as a default data storage format. On SQL level this will
Alexander,
It doesn't matter if you use SQL. Without SQL it should work though. Did you
get any exception when you tried this?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Mix-in-cache-keys-objects-with-different-types-tp14354p14426.html
Sent from the
Hi Alexander,
Ticket for this already exists for a while:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5189
You can try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property, usually it
helps to avoid this exception.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Hi Alexander,
This function provided inconsistent mapping for caches created on different
topology versions. Basically this means that collocation was not working
properly in some scenario, so we decided to get rid of this function. Please
use RendezvousAffinityFunction instead.
-Val
--
View
Hi,
See CacheConfiguration#nodeFilter property. It's just a predicate that
filters out nodes, cache will be deployed only on those for which filter
returns true. The easiest way would be to set custom attributes via
IgniteConfiguration#userAttributes and filter out using AttributeNodeFilter
which
Try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property on all nodes.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Starting-the-Server-tp14398p14422.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Roger,
This is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5189
Try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Rishi,
This is usually caused by either network or memory issues. Check that you
don't have any network glitches and that there are no GC pauses, memory
leaks, etc. on the nodes.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Hi Srini,
Is Cassandra listening to port other than 9042?
Also how do you configure Cassandra store? connection.properties file is
used only in tests, Ignite doesn't actually provide this way of configuring.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
Hi Stephen,
Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty
email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.
macdonagh wrote
> Are there logs which will show the
Hello,
are there any concerns about larg-ish keys, like a UUID?
What if even larger, like a string of variable length?
I am using Ignite SQL.
Some objects have a single primary key, and in most cases it is a UUID. I am
trying to decide if we should
a) create an artificial key (long) and have
Getting Started with Apache® Ignite™ (Part 5). Akmal Chaudhri pens the fifth
article in this blog series focusing this time on the support for a
distributed SQL database. http://bit.ly/2suoIMc
--
View this message in context:
Hi Val, yes, this is the same issue. Appreciate helping out.
Jessie
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Use-AtomicLong-or-AtomicSequence-in-Streaming-tp14350p14413.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm using spring based cassandra cache store.
In connection.properties,
contact.points=some-ip-address (working)
contact.point=some-host-name(working)
contact.points=some-ip-address:9042 (not working)
contact.point=some-host-name:9042(not working)
hello Igniters,
we are seeing frequent disconnection between ignite instances, we have IP
based clusters which has following configuration -
Ignite version - 1.7.0
Hello,
I am unable to make a connection from a client on Windows to an Ignite server
cluster running on 3 Linux machines. I have checked firewall settings on both.
I am running a 3-node cluster of Ignite (2.0.0) on Centos 7. The nodes are
connected to the same Ethernet switch. The cluster is
Hello Taras,
thanks, this example is showing a normal query with a fixed value, this is
working, the problem is passing a parameter to the predicate.
Cheers,
Guilherme Melo
www.gmelo.org
On 6 July 2017 at 22:18, Taras Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sure, please take a look at
Hi ,
I am getting below Exception while starting the ignite.sh .
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.send(GridIoManager.java:1334)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.sendToGridTopic(GridIoManager.java:1398)
at
Hi,
Sure, please take a look at the example:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/datagrid/CacheQueryExample.java#L155
On 06.07.2017 11:13, Guilherme Melo wrote:
Hello, I am having problems submitting a query to the service from a
How I can do the computation on compute node and data node?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Compute-Node-computation-on-data-node-tp14396.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Verified! :)
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Abhishek Gupta <
abhishekduttagupta2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please verify me
>
Hi Alex,
Yes Value2.class was already added to indextypes.
I am only reading the value which is why copyOnRead is set to "false".
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Poor-cross-cache-join-SQL-performance-v2-0-0-tp14373p14382.html
Sent from the
Hello, I am having problems submitting a query to the service from a
client. Using the example from the documentation:
IgniteCache cache = ignite.cache("mycache");
int sal = 100// Find only persons earning more than 1,000.try
(QueryCursor cursor = cache.query(new ScanQuery((k, p) ->
Hi,
Add Value2 to the list of the indexed classes (setIndexedTypes).
What is the reason for setting copyOnRead(false)?
If the problem still stands after the fix, please check GC or take a JFR.
Kind regards,
Alex
6 июля 2017 г. 7:29 AM пользователь "iostream [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
Hi, Val!
The problem is solved in that such modifications in filterReachable()
method:
for (Future fut : futs) {
try {
fut.get();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
throw new
45 matches
Mail list logo