Hi all,
We're observing this in a 3 node server cluster(3 separate JVMs, in 3 separate
VMs within same datacenter, node to node latency is 2-3 milliseconds within the
network).
As with following code is wrapped inside an http API, and that API is getting
called by a 5000 users ramping
Ignition.start is supposed to start an Ignite instance, so passing
spring-cache.xml file that doesn't contain any Ignite configuration doesn't
make sense. The SpringCacheManager bean should be part of the Spring
Application Context, it then will be used as an entry point to Ignite
cluster. It
No. Persistence is disabled in my case.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Do you have persistence enabled?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:31 PM ndipiazza3565 <
nicholas.dipia...@lucidworks.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to build up a list of possible causes for this issue.
>
> I'm only really interested in the issues that occur after successful
> production deployments. Meaning
I'm trying to build up a list of possible causes for this issue.
I'm only really interested in the issues that occur after successful
production deployments. Meaning the environment has been up for some time
successfully, but then later on our ignite nodes will not start and stick
But as of
Thanks!
Tried joining with an inlined table instead of IN as per the second
suggestion, and it didn't quite work.
Query1:
- Select COUNT(*) FROM( Select customer_id from GATABLE3 use Index( )
where category_id in (9005, 175930, 175930, 175940,175945,101450, 6453)
group by customer_id
Thanks!
For #2: wouldn't H2 need to bring the data into the heap to make the
queries? Or at least some of the date to do the group_by and sum operation?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:19 AM Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> Answering your questions:
> 1) Grouping is performed on both mapper
I want to use ignite as cache api as well as spring cache provider. I am
running following configuration in ignite-config.xml file as below
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Hello Eugene,
I hope you meant PME (partitions map exchange) instead of NPE :)
> What constitutes a transaction in this context?
If I am not mistaken, it is about Ignite transactions.
Please take a look at this page
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/transactions
> Does it mean that if the
Hi,
A question regarding
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8386?focusedCommentId=16511394=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16511394
It states that a pkey index with a compoise pKey is "effectively useless".
Could you please explain why is
Igor R,
Could you please review this C* contribution?
--
Denis
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:33 AM Dmitriy Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> I can see that ticket is still in patch available state.
>
> Denis M.
>
> could you please review the patch?
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> вт, 26 сент.
Make sense
I think the actual issue that was affecting me is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562. (which IEP-25 should
solve).
Final 2 questions:
1) If all NPE waits for all pending transactions
a) What constitutes a transaction in this context? (any query, a SQL
transaction, etc)
Hi Rishikesh,
Thanks for pointing out to this. I've updated the stateless deployment doc.
--
Denis
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 7:06 AM rishi007bansod
wrote:
> "serviceAccountName: ignite" should be present in Pod Deployment
> specification as mentioned by Anton in post
>
>
System thread pool is used for cache and cache store operation. However, I
would discourage you from limiting it to 1 thread.
In general, extend the cache store implementation you use and forward all
CacheStore.read() operations to your single-threaded pool.
--
Denis
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at
Good question :)
yardstick does this, but not sure if it is a valid prod solution.
https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/3307a8b26ccb5f0bb7e9c387c73fd221b98ab668/modules/yardstick/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/yardstick/jdbc/AbstractJdbcBenchmark.java
We have set preferIPv4Stack=true and
Eugene,
In the case of Zookeeper Discovery is enabled and communication problem
between some nodes, a subset of problem nodes will be automatically killed
to reach cluster state where each node can communicate with each other
without problems. So, you're absolutely right, dead nodes will be
Hi Eugene,
I've reproduced your problem and filed a ticket for that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562
As a temporary workaround, I can suggest you delete persistence data
(cache.dat and partition files) related to that cache in starting node work
directory or don't destroy
Hi Pavel,
The issue we are discussing is PME failing because one node cannot
communicate to another node, that's what IEP-25 is trying to solve. But in
that case (where one node is either down, or there is a communication
problem between two nodes) I would expect the split brain resolver to kick
Hi Eugene,
Sorry, but I didn't catch the meaning of your question about Zookeeper
Discovery. Could you please re-phrase it?
ср, 12 сент. 2018 г. в 17:54, Ilya Lantukh :
> Pavel K., can you please answer about Zookeeper discovery?
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:49 PM, eugene miretsky <
>
Hello!
How would you distinguish the wrong interface (172.17.0.1) from the right
one if you were Ignite?
I think it's not the first time I have seen this problem but I have
positively no idea how to tackle it.
Maybe Docker experts could chime in?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 12 сент. 2018
Pavel K., can you please answer about Zookeeper discovery?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:49 PM, eugene miretsky
wrote:
> Thanks for the patience with my questions - just trying to understand the
> system better.
>
> 3) I was referring to https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/
>
Thanks for the patience with my questions - just trying to understand the
system better.
3) I was referring to
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/zookeeper-discovery#section-failures-and-split-brain-handling.
How come it doesn't get the node to shut down?
4) Are there any docs/JIRAs that explain
Hi, in our cache we have a column which is calculated by other columns,
for example column-C is calculated by column-A / column-B
When there is an update from column-A or column B, can ignite handle the
calculation of column-C ? Thanks
--
Sent from:
3) Such mechanics will be implemented in IEP-25 (linked above).
4) Partition map states include update counters, which are incremented on
every cache update and play important role in new state calculation. So,
technically, every cache operation can lead to partition map change, and
for obvious
Hi,
it's a really bad idea to do cache operations in Discovery thread. If you
want to add something to the cache, you can start a new thread and do this
operation inside the new thread.
Evgenii
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Sorry, here is the link for the BinaryObject doc:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/binary-marshaller
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi,
Do you mean Ignite Queue? Or just your data structure that stored in simple
Ignite cache?
> Store data in another format let's say JSON and provide backwards
> compatibility at code level.
There is no need for this, Ignite internally stores everything as
BinaryObject and this format supports
Hi,
Did your thick .net client connected to the cluster?
It should be visible in server node's logs.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:58 PM Som Som <2av10...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the cache names list is empty then i call the method of non thin client
> butmy TestCache is stil
the cache names list is empty then i call the method of non thin client
butmy TestCache is stil exists and i can see it under the thin client. i
cant see the cache from NON thin client if it is created from thin client.
ср, 12 сент. 2018 г., 13:29 Evgenii Zhuravlev :
> Hi,
>
> You can always get
Hi Igniters,
I can see that ticket is still in patch available state.
Denis M.
could you please review the patch?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
вт, 26 сент. 2017 г. в 12:10, Denis Mekhanikov :
> There is a page in confluence with description of the process:
>
Hi,
You can always get the list of the all caches in cluster using
Ignite.cacheNames() method.
Evgenii
ср, 12 сент. 2018 г. в 13:26, Som Som <2av10...@gmail.com>:
> Hello
>
>
>
> I created new cache using thin .net client:
>
>
>
> public class TestEntity
>
> {
>
> public string
Hello
I created new cache using thin .net client:
public class TestEntity
{
public string ValueString { get; set; }
public DateTime ValueDateTime { get; set; }
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var
hows it going with this Luqman
I am still exploring an approach to single signon using kerberos without
needing config files. I think i have made progress but i need to register a
service principal name first.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hello.
Do you really need to add all this data in a single transaction? That's not
a typical use case. Do you have any other operations running in parallel?
Unfortunately, having this stack trace is not enough to help. Could you
provide a full ignite log and your configuration as well?
--
Sent
Evgenii -
Thank for your reply!
"system memory cache" means the result printed by 'free -m' command.
After some test, I solved the problem, it caused by my Linux setting, not
Ignite.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
2b) I had a few situations where the cluster went into a state where PME
constantly failed, and could never recover. I think the root cause was that
a transaction got stuck and didn't timeout/rollback. I will try to
reproduce it again and get back to you
3) If a node is down, I would expect it to
36 matches
Mail list logo