Re: Ignite on AKS and RBAC issue

Hello Alex, thanks for the tip but putting everything on the namespace ignite does not help. I also rechecked the documentation. I still get the 403. Additional question : how does the service account and the service relate? So I have a 1) service account kubectl describe serviceaccount ignite

Re: Using SORT BY and ORDER BY

There is the question. It turns out that I need to collocate the table, because the field COL will have different values? But how can i do this? -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Re: Using SORT BY and ORDER BY

Thank you! -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Using SORT BY and ORDER BY

The org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.query.CacheQuery interface has a comment: * {@code Group by} and {@code sort by} statements are applied separately * on each node, so result set will likely be incorrectly grouped or sorted * after results from multiple

Re: Remote Filter Execution

Hi Ilya, Yes, So filter gets created but not executed on more than one node. 'Entered Remote Filter' happens only on one node. 'Filter created' log is printed in the 'create()' method of the Factory. 'Entered Remote Filter' is printed in the evaluate method of the CacheEntryEventFilter. That

Re: DataStreamer. allowOverwrite(false) - Will it slow the writes?

Hi - Yes, Ignite native persistence is enabled. Thanx and Regards, KR Kumar -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Re: Ignite on AKS and RBAC issue

Hi, I see that you've bound everything to the "default" namespace. kubectl describe serviceaccount ignite Name:ignite Namespace: default Make everything in the "ignite" namespace as described here: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/rbac-authorization

Ignite on AKS and RBAC issue

Hello, I am deploying an embeded version of ignite on AKS and I am getting this error: Caused by: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: https://kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local:443/api/v1/namespaces/default/endpoints/processing-engine-pe-v1-ignite at

Re: Using SORT BY and ORDER BY

Hello! 1. I guess it is a honest mistake. 2. The idea here is that you can't expect that GROUP BY COL will return anything relevant, if the table is not collocated by COL. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 17:34, Surkov.Aleksandr : > The

Re: How do I know the cache rebalance is finished?

Hi, I think it is not a priority issue, because in general it is right. EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_STOPPED event is received when all data loaded to a node, but switch of affinity happens after all cache will be rebalanced. At first, why do you need to know, when affinity change after rebalance? In my

Re: Remote Filter Execution

Hello! I see the following lines on all 3 nodes: 2020-07-09 16:41:02,957 [disco-notifier-worker-#101] DEBUG com.COMPANYNAME.prophet.configstore.common.remote.ConfigStoreTableRemoteFilterFactory [] - projectname LISTENS: Filter creation started with

Re: [External]Re: Ignite cluster became unresponsive

Hello! It seems that communication connections were closed after CG pause, then you have got half-open connections. It is recommended to keep socketWriteTimeout and failure detection timeout in relative sync. Default socketWriteTimeout on TcpConnectionSpi is very low while your failure detection

Re: Remote Filter Execution

HI Ilya, Please find the attached logs. You will notice that this log is only on server 1 - "projectname LISTENS: Entered Remote Filter ." You can also see that the filter has been created on all the three nodes. ( LOG : projectname LISTENS: Filter created ) server1RemoteFilterExecuted.txt

Re: Ignite Backup and Restore

Hello! I guess that Apache Ignite 2.9 will have snapshotting capabilities. Traditionally we rely more on backup nodes/partitions than on off-line backups. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 8 июл. 2020 г. в 12:23, marble.zh...@coinflex.com < marble.zh...@coinflex.com>: > Hi, any suggestions? >

Re: ignite 2.8.1: Failed to resolve node topology

Hello! It seems that the node fell behind in switching to new topology. Can you provide full log of this node? I guess that something was blocking PME. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 09:44, Mahesh Renduchintala < mahesh.renduchint...@aline-consulting.com>: > Hi, > > We

Re: [External]Re: Ignite cluster became unresponsive

Hello! Can you provide full thread dump (jstack) after you see these messages? Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 8 июл. 2020 г. в 15:57, Kamlesh Joshi : > Hi Stephen/Team, > > > > Did you got any chance to look into this? > > > > *Thanks and Regards,* > > *Kamlesh Joshi* > > > > *From:*

Re: Block until partition map exchange is complete

Hello! Can you throw together a reproducer project which shows this behavior? I would check. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 3 июл. 2020 г. в 13:14, ssansoy : > Thanks - the issue I have now is how can I confirm that the local listen > has > returned before executing my code? > e.g. in the

Re: Ignite server of perNodeParallelOperatoins ?

Hello! Yes, there is Data Streamer Thread Pool Size on server, which corresponds to perNodeParallelOperations. Server will not run more parallel operations than thread pool size. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 7 июл. 2020 г. в 23:18, Edward Chen : > Hello, > > In IgniteDataStreamer, there

Re: enum behavior in REST

Hello! Can you provide an example of REST response? I don't understand how this issue manifests. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 8 июл. 2020 г. в 01:25, Maxim Volkomorov <2201...@gmail.com>: > I have "type":{"platformType":false}" in REST response for my > enum object property. > > Object

Re: DataStreamer. allowOverwrite(false) - Will it slow the writes?

Hello! I don't think so. It is supposed to speed it up. Do you have persistence? With persistence, you would expect a slow-down after an initial spike. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 15:09, krkumar24061...@gmail.com < krkumar24061...@gmail.com>: > Hi Guys - If I have my

DataStreamer. allowOverwrite(false) - Will it slow the writes?

Hi Guys - If I have my data streamer's allowOverwrite is set to false which is default, will this cause my read IOPS go up as it need to check if the key already exist? Bcoz the behavior that we see is that the write performance goes down significantly after it has inserted few billion rows and

Re: Ignite node top ram limit

Hello! I don't think there is any, if we are talking of off-heap size. Any problems in case of node failure are shared by persistent clusters which have more data than RAM. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 8 июл. 2020 г. в 18:01, Maxim Volkomorov <2201...@gmail.com>: > Is there a RAM limit

Re: Request among nodes taking minimum of idleConnectionTimeout configuration in tcpcommunicationSpi

Hello! Maybe you have some firewall issue here, such as only one way connections are possible but not the other way around. We do not recommend geo-distributed clustering with Apache Ignite. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 7 июл. 2020 г. в 06:59, trans : > Hi, can someone please suggest on

Re: Destroying a ignite cache when one of the worker nodes is down

Hello! As far as I know, there is no such way yet. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 17:22, krkumar24061...@gmail.com < krkumar24061...@gmail.com>: > Hi Guys - I have a five node cluster and all the nodes are part of the > baseline. Ignite native persistence is enabled. If one

Re: Remote Filter Execution

Hello! This is weird, I recommend checking logs for exceptions, maybe the filter cannot run on two other server nodes. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 10:25, VeenaMithare : > Hello, > > We have a 3 server cluster . The Caches on this cluster are configured as >

Remote Filter Execution

Hello, We have a 3 server cluster . The Caches on this cluster are configured as PARTITIONED, with 1 BACKUP. We also have a client executing a simple continuous query awaiting updates on record where NAME=AA. 1. When this record is updated, I see the remote filter being executed only on one