Hi,
Again, I understand why it is as it is. My concern was that from a design
perspective it adds a dimension to the key for "technical" reasons. I wanted to
make sure that it is the way to go. Thanks for thr clarification
Best Regards
Original Message
Subject: RE: Affinity
Hi Steve,
Affinity key field must be a part of key, simply because affinity does not
depend on value at all. It's not even required to have a value to calculate
affinity.
However, you can simply move the corresponding field from value object to
key object. You can still use it in queries and it
Hi!
Could you please give/describe some simple example of your usage? I can't
actually get your point.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Affinity-not-based-on-the-fields-in-the-key-tp9450p9480.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users
