Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-30 Thread Vladimir Ozerov
ial >>>> optimization which will write such fields in special compact format. >>>> >>>> Vladimir. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:55 PM, vkulichenko < >>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, null values consume memory. I believe this can be optimized, but I >>>>> haven't seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of >>>>> fields >>>>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal. >>>>> >>>>> -Val >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >>>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html >>>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >

Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-28 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
t; Hi, >>>> >>>> Yes, null values consume memory. I believe this can be optimized, but I >>>> haven't seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of fields >>>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal. >>>> >>>> -Val >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html >>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >> >

Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-28 Thread Vladimir Ozerov
x27;t seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of fields >>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal. >>> >>> -Val >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html >>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >

Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-27 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
f fields >> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal. >> >> -Val >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html >> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >

答复: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-27 Thread Shawn Du
/vol8/p1816-teller.pdf. Thanks Shawn 发件人: Vladimir Ozerov [mailto:voze...@gridgain.com] 发送时间: 2016年10月28日 5:21 收件人: user@ignite.apache.org 主题: Re: BinaryObject pros/cons Hi, I am not very concerned with null fields overhead, because usually it won't be significant. However, there

Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-27 Thread Vladimir Ozerov
fields > most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal. > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. > 70518.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-27 Thread vkulichenko
18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

BinaryObject pros/cons

2016-10-27 Thread Shawn Du
Hi expert, BinaryObject gives great convenience to create dynamic objects. Does it have disadvantages? Take below example, does each field name will consume memory or not? Many RDBMS which has fixed table schema, column name willn't use memory/disk. How does it for BinaryObject? If so