ial
>>>> optimization which will write such fields in special compact format.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:55 PM, vkulichenko <
>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, null values consume memory. I believe this can be optimized, but I
>>>>> haven't seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of
>>>>> fields
>>>>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Val
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705
>>>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
>>>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
t; Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, null values consume memory. I believe this can be optimized, but I
>>>> haven't seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of fields
>>>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal.
>>>>
>>>> -Val
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705
>>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
>>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
x27;t seen issues with this so far. Unless you have hundreds of fields
>>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal.
>>>
>>> -Val
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705
>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>
f fields
>> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal.
>>
>> -Val
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705
>> 18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
/vol8/p1816-teller.pdf.
Thanks
Shawn
发件人: Vladimir Ozerov [mailto:voze...@gridgain.com]
发送时间: 2016年10月28日 5:21
收件人: user@ignite.apache.org
主题: Re: BinaryObject pros/cons
Hi,
I am not very concerned with null fields overhead, because usually it won't be
significant. However, there
fields
> most of which are nulls (very rare case), the overhead is minimal.
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
18.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObject-pros-cons-tp8541p8563.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi expert,
BinaryObject gives great convenience to create dynamic objects. Does it have
disadvantages?
Take below example, does each field name will consume memory or not? Many
RDBMS which has fixed table schema, column name willn't use memory/disk.
How does it for BinaryObject?
If so