Re: Ignite ODBC Driver v/s Ignite C++ driver

2017-11-17 Thread Igor Sapego
That's right. You can watch it for update notifications. Best Regards, Igor On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:37 PM, kotamrajuyashasvi < kotamrajuyasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Yes.. around 100-150 C++ processes or may be threads will be running on a > machine, but each process/thread requires to

Re: Ignite ODBC Driver v/s Ignite C++ driver

2017-11-17 Thread kotamrajuyashasvi
Hi Yes.. around 100-150 C++ processes or may be threads will be running on a machine, but each process/thread requires to use a separate transaction. I found out that along with sql transactions feature ticket, a separate ticket is present to implement transactions support for ODBC. Hope it will

Re: Ignite ODBC Driver v/s Ignite C++ driver

2017-11-16 Thread kotamrajuyashasvi
Hi Thanks for your response. Actually I'm working on a C++ project where multiple C++ processes run in parallel. Each process should connect to Ignite Server initially and start a transaction. Cassandra is used as persistent store(The main reason to use ignite on top of Cassandra is for the

Re: Ignite ODBC Driver v/s Ignite C++ driver

2017-11-16 Thread Igor Sapego
Hi, Ignite C++ indeed starts JVM process, but it is not just client, it is basically ordinary Ignite node, that can be client or server and can do in cluster almost anything, that Java Ignite node can, although, C++ still does not have all the features that Java API has. So, basically, C++ allows

Ignite ODBC Driver v/s Ignite C++ driver

2017-11-15 Thread kotamrajuyashasvi
Hi I have a C++ Application that needs to perform query operations(DML and Select) and transactions on Ignite Server. Whats the best way to achieve this ? There are two choices: 1. Ignite ODBC driver and 2. Ignite C++ Driver. I would like to what would be right choice to use from the point of