Hello!
It was disabled not just because of potential data loss but because the
cache was resurrected on such start and could break cluster.
Creating cache per operation and destroying afterwards is an anti-pattern,
it can cause all sorts of issues and is better avoided.
Regards,
--
Ilya
Hi,
I tried your suggestion of using a NodeFilter but, is not solving this
issue. Using a NodeFilter by consistent-id in order to create the cache in
only one node is creating persistence information in every node:
In the node for which the filter is true (directory size 75MB):
Hi, thanks for the prompt response
We can have several of these caches, one for each query (is an exceptional
case but, with load, there can be several simultaneously) that is being
executed so we would like to preserve the persistence to take advantage of
the swapping in case the amount of memory
Hi,
Have you tried to put the temp cache into the different, non persisted,
memory region?
You can also try to use a node filter to control what nodes should store
the cache.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, 19:24 xero wrote:
> Hi Ignite team, We have a use case where a small portion of the dataset
>
Hi Ignite team, We have a use case where a small portion of the dataset must
answer successive queries that could be relatively expensive. For this, we
create a temporary cache with that small subset of the dataset and operate
on that new cache. At the end of the process, that cache is destroyed.
