Re: Scoped vs Singleton ignite client node in .net web api

2018-12-19 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Replied on StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53842387/scoped-vs-singleton-ignite-client-node-in-net-web-api/ In short, use Singleton, because "Thick" client is heavy and thread-safe. On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:28 PM aealexsandrov wrote: > Hi, > > Generally

Re: Scoped vs Singleton ignite client node in .net web api

2018-12-19 Thread aealexsandrov
Hi, Generally, you should have a working Ignite cluster somewhere that will store and process your requests. I am not sure that you really require the client node in your case. It will use additional memory and CPU. You can use several ways to work with Ignite cluster without fat client node: 1

Scoped vs Singleton ignite client node in .net web api

2018-12-18 Thread martynas
I am try planning to introduce Apache Ignite into existing old .net web api project to use it as key/value store for detecting duplicate requests sent to the load balanced api. I would like to introduce minimum overhead to each request. As I understand Client node is communicating to the server t