Yes, you are right.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:13 PM the_palakkaran wrote:
> So to conclude, if I have enabled on heap storage for cache(using
> cache.setOnHeapEnabled(true),
> then :
> 1. Still data will be stored off heap, but will be loaded to heap. To
> escape
> out of memory error, I have
Hi,
We run a ignite cluster in kubernetes. We currently deploy our containerised
java code which uses xml to configure ignite nodes and start them. We use
Kubernetes Discovery for service discovery.
I want to do automatic cluster activation by defining baseline topology
using control.sh script
Thanks Dmitry
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hello,
> How should I write the "alter table Person" statement if I want to add a
> new member
> to class Address after the cache has been created?
I don't think that there is a way to do it for nested objects,
unfortunately.
In that case, I think that you need to update your configuration [1]
Hi Alex,
I cannot get it to reproduce in my local environment yet. I will get back to
you with thread dumps as soon as I encounter this issue again.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hello Cong,
> when we add a field to the first-level value object and add a column to
> the table dynamically, they can be connected automatically.
Yes, that is correct.
> So now the problem is when we add a field to the nested object and add a
> column to the table,
> they cannot be connected
Hi,
> How can I write the “Create Table” statement to create columns for the two
> members of Address in Table Person?
If I am not mistaken, SQL tables cannot contain nested objects.
Apache Ignite SQL engine allows executing SQL queries of nested fields. In
case, a cache was configured via
Fixed it! I needed to put my thread to sleep while the query was open, like
this:
try (QueryCursor> cur = cityCache.query(qry)) {
// Iterating over existing data stored in cache.
for (Cache.Entry e : cur)
System.out.println("key=" + e.getKey() + ", val=" + e.getValue());
boolean done =
So can I add a field to a nested object dynamically (without restarting the
cluster) by using annotations?
-Original Message-
From: slava.koptilin [mailto:slava.kopti...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2018年6月21日 10:44
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: RE: A bug in SQL "CREATE TABLE" and its
Hi,
Unfortunately, in your environment, you can't stop the node without losing
the data. To stop one node safety you require at least one backup.
BR,
Andrei
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
We've run into a problem recently where it appears our cache is deadlocking
during loading. What I mean by "loading" is that we start up a new cluster
in AWS, unconnected to any existing cluster, and then shove a bunch of data
into it from Kafka. During this process it's not taking any significant
Hi,
I don't think this feature requires any change in the SQL API.
When we create a cache, even if the value object contains a nested object, the
fields in the nested object can be mapped to columns in the table. Now we can
do this using QueryEntity, for example,
QueryEntity personEntity =
Hi,
All existing options of control.sh tool you can see here:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/baseline-topology#section-cluster-activation-tool
To connect to some host and port you can use --host --port options (default
values 127.0.0.1 and 11211).
In case if you started the ignite in
Hi,
It depends on how complex your service would be. Considering that you're
going to use some HTTP server to process your REST queries, I would go for
the first approach and scale that HTTP server with AWS.
--
Denis
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:53 PM smovva wrote:
> I have ignite data grid and
>
> Why there exists an official plugin for Cassandra integration then ?
To accelerate *existing* Cassandra deployments because Cassandra's
in-memory options are not as good as Ignite.
If it's a brand new application, then I would use Ignite persistence from
the very beginning. Here is you can
I can see from the docs for IgniteConfiguration that some properties
auto-size based on visible OS resources. In docker, "visible" ends up being
the host values, which will exceed any CPU/memory limits applied via
cgroups to the container.
I see on
Hi,
Looks like you’re performing a cache operation (invoke()) from a StreamReceiver
– this is not allowed.
Check out this SO answer
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43891757/closures-stuck-in-2-0-when-try-to-add-an-element-into-the-queue.
Stan
From: breischl
Sent: 21 июня 2018 г. 19:35
To:
Hey, Apache Ignite folks from New York! Coming to your roaring city to give
three Ignite-based talks. Come over, let's meet in person.
1. Ignite vs. Cassandra for Hybrid Transaction/Analytical Applications:
http://bit.ly/2JO0rxj
2. Ignite internals (hard-core!!!): http://bit.ly/2Icovny
3. Ignite
Hi Team,
Issue is still there in 2.5.0
Steps to reproduce:
1) start 2 servers + 2 clients topology
2) start load testing on client nodes
3) stop server 1
4) start server 1
5) stop server 1 again when rebalancing is in progress
=> and we got data corrupted here, see error below
=> we were not
Yes, you are right, hashes for 00.wal and 01.wal are different before/after
load test
(last-modified-time still showing june 15th)
BEFORE
PS F:\ignite-wal\V_HP_LK_DCN01> get-filehash .\*
Algorithm Hash
-
SHA256
Hi Vishwas,
Where your kubernetes cluster is located? Google Cloud, Openshift or
somewhere else?
I've checked your service account configs (with role and binding) on Google
Cloud. It works well. Maybe the problem in your deployment file or in
changes related to docker image.
Here are the steps
21 matches
Mail list logo
