Andrey,
BTW, you can give a try to GridGain community release that is fully
based on Apache Ignite and includes additional bug fixes and improvements.
The latest GridGain release 7.5.6 already contains the fix for this bug [1].
After next Apache Ignite version goes live you can switch back to
Hi!
Sorry for the long question in advance...
I'm doing some performance measurements on Ignite to see if it would work
for a new project. So far, I love Ignite, but I would like some help
resolving an issue with latency.
Here's my setup:
3 RHEL machines running Ignite in "server" mode, with a
Hi Mateusz,
In version 1.5 we released the binary objects [1] format that allows to
store cache in class version independent form. Thus you don't need to
have any classes on server side.
This ability allows dynamic change to an objects structure, and even
allows multiple clients with
Hi, Vaibhav
It seems for me that SQL should be: SELECT * FROM
"CodingSchemes".CodingScheme
Also in GUI Visor there a button "Metadata" on SQL Tab that will show
dialog with all SQL types and option to generate query.
Hope this help.
Hi Moiz,
As I see from the other discussion [1], you're referring to, Val has
already given you suggestions.
If you got into some issues related to [1] then I would recommend to
discuss them there.
[1]
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/AffinityKey-for-co-location-td2772.html
Hi Ravi,
There is IgniteCache.putAll method for your service.
Moreover, there are other alternatives that can be used when you need to
preload caches [1].
[1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/data-loading
--
Denis
On 2/10/2016 1:24 PM, Ravi wrote:
i have one more doubt that i created
Hi flob,
Can you please subscribe to the mailing list so that the community receives
email notifications? Please follow the instruction here:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1
flob wrote
> I have this app that populates the cache and
Hi again,
So my issue seems to be due to saturation at the client side. If I do too many
async operations, they appear to be queueing up, so the latency I was seeing
included the time they were waiting in line to go out to the server.
Is it possible to increase the number of parallel async
Hi Dmitry,
What are you trying to achieve by putting the RDD into the cache as a single
entry? If you want to save RDD data into the Ignite cache, it's better to
create IgniteRDD and use its savePairs() or saveValues() methods. See [1]
for details.
[1]
I am using an IGFS backed by local filesystem. For the purposes of
verificaiton, I would like to
make sure that the content is being written successfully (of course I could
also read content back and ensure its written).
However, I would like to turn on an "immediate flush" option whereby the
Hi,
Please see inline
On 2/11/2016 8:48 AM, thesrc2016 wrote:
Hi, I'm a new to Ignite and just trying to get my head round how exactly it
can integrate with Spark.
I have been looking through the overview and the diagrams for IgniteRDD but
still things are a little unclear to me.
I guess my
Moiz,
What version you're on?
Please switch to Ignite version 1.5 and set peerClassLoadingEnabled back
to true. You shouldn't face with the undeployment when using 1.5 because
BinaryMarshaller will be enabled by default.
--
Denis
On 2/10/2016 11:12 AM, Syed Moizuddin wrote:
I am setting
Thanks very much for the quick response Denis.
I think what you are saying then, is that I can't through configuration only
interject the IgniteRDD implementation into Spark core. I need to write some
code to wire this all up.
Looks like I'll have to consider constructing my own variant of the
Dear community,
I would like to share the news about MyBatis-Ignite integration release, as a
result of the collaboration between Ignite and MyBatis teams.
http://blog.mybatis.org/2016/02/mybatis-ignite-released.html
>From now please consider using Apache Ignite as your 2nd level MaBatis
Hi, I'm a new to Ignite and just trying to get my head round how exactly it
can integrate with Spark.
I have been looking through the overview and the diagrams for IgniteRDD but
still things are a little unclear to me.
I guess my query comes down to - can Ignite RDD simply be configured for use
Team,
Could you please provide some input on that?
I am blocked since it looks like EntryProcessor can't be used at all (at
least with PARTITIONED cache).
Thanks,
2016-02-09 15:57 GMT+02:00 Myron Chelyada :
> Hmm, doing the same but with:
>
>
Myron,
I tried to reproduce this assertion on ignite-1.5, but with no luck. Can
you share your full cache configuration, the number of nodes in your
clusterr and a code snippet allowing to reproduce the issue?
Thanks,
AG
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your reply.
So, summing up, it seems that in the context of my use case, version 1.5
does not differ from 1.4? Which means that I still cannot achieve my goal:
different versions of the same class (from different clients) running on
the cluster at the same time?
As far as I
Hi Kobe,
It sounds like you're using DUAL_ASYNC IGFS mode, is this the case? To
update the secondary file system synchronously, simply switch to DUAL_SYNC
in the configuration. Is this what you're looking for?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
19 matches
Mail list logo