Re: [2.10 branch]cpp thin client transaction :Transaction with id 1 not found.

Hi Igor, 1.The actual test environment uses static IP address directly. 2.Three IP addresses are specified as follows: cfg.SetEndPoints("172.16.100.71,172.16.100.72,172.16.100.73"); 在 2021/2/4 下午7:40, Igor Sapego 写道: Thanks, I've a few more questions, just to be clear: 1. Are servers behind

Rebalancing Errors

Hello Folks The attempts to partition rebalancing in my ignite clusters fail with the following errors. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using ignite 2.8.1. [2021-02-02 19:57:03,428][WARN ][tcp-disco-msg-worker-[ef238b3f 10.244.69.14:47500]-#2][root] Possible failure suppressed

Re: putAll() performance big difference, 2.7.5 vs 2.9.1

Thanks for heads up. Although for my case, the cache configuration is all by default, partition/atomic/zero backup. I guess some general logic was changed in 2.9.1 impact all type of atomicity modes. On 2021/02/04 09:27:31, jjimeno wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe it has to do with this: > >

Re: putAll() performance big difference, 2.7.5 vs 2.9.1

Update with DataStreamer, Ignite 2.7.5 still much better than 2.9.1 on throughput. However, my OP with putAll() in fact deliver highest throughput. gist https://gist.github.com/PingHao/f104c02e86bfbea9c0bd8d1abcfdb912 10 working threads, shared same DataStreamer instance, 40 thread pool size of

Persistent atomics

I'm using Ignite.Net 2.9.1. Is there any way to create Atomic Types in persistent storage on a per entity basis? -- Kathryn Hogg Principal Technology Architect

Re: [External]Re: Exporter usage of Ignite 2.8.0

Thanks for providing the config! I copied/pasted it into my example-default.xml. Afterwards I started a server node using ./ignite.sh ../examples/config/example-default.xml. I am using Ignite 2.8.1 btw. Unfortunately I am still getting no result. The root cause must lie somewhere else.

Re: data rebalancing and partition map exchange with persistence

Hi Alan, I am sorry for the typo in your name, it was done unintentionally. Thanks, S. чт, 4 февр. 2021 г. в 19:10, Вячеслав Коптилин : > Hello Allan, > > > Does data rebalancing occur when a node leaves or joins, or only when > you manually change the baseline topology (assuming automatic

Re: data rebalancing and partition map exchange with persistence

Hello Allan, > Does data rebalancing occur when a node leaves or joins, or only when you manually change the baseline topology (assuming automatic baseline adjustment is disabled)? Again, this is on a cluster with persistence enabled. Yes, this can happen when a node joins the cluster, for

Re: [External]Re: Exporter usage of Ignite 2.8.0

I more-or-less just copy-and-pasted your example: https://github.com/GridGain-Demos/ignite-prometheus/blob/main/src/main/resources/ignite-prometheus.xml Regards, Stephen > On 4 Feb 2021, at 15:41, VincentCE wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > I am glad to here that the configuration works for you!

Re: [External]Re: Exporter usage of Ignite 2.8.0

Hi Stephen, I am glad to here that the configuration works for you! Unfortunately I already tried different ports but this didn't solve my problem, also I am not running ignites REST server. Could you possibly share the ignite configuration which is working for you? Best, Vincent -- Sent

Re: [External]Re: Exporter usage of Ignite 2.8.0

That’s a good trick! I couldn’t figure out the Spring magic required to call a static method, but that works for me. (I had written a small lifecycle bean, which also works, but this is better.) I would try to have your collector running on a port other than 8080. That’s a pretty common port

Re: putAll() performance big difference, 2.7.5 vs 2.9.1

I don't know data-streaming, but will check it out later. Here it is ignite config on one server node, same as other nodes. http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation="

[MEETUP] Apache Ignite at Dutch Railways. Join the talk on February 16

Hi Igniters! Here’s the cool case of Ignite in production. Every day, millions of people travel by train through the Netherlands—on one of the busiest rail infrastructures in Europe. More than 10,000 train movements are performed daily. Planning for all these train rides and designing a timetable

Re: [External]Re: Exporter usage of Ignite 2.8.0

Hi! We would like to use the prometheus/opencensus exporter for our server nodes which we start using an xml configuration. Facundo.maldonado mentioned before that this can be done wrapping the collector and http server in another bean. This is what I tried which is probably not exactly as

Re: putAll() performance big difference, 2.7.5 vs 2.9.1

Hi, 1. Can you please attach the CacheConfiguration as well? 2. Have you tried DataStreamer https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/data-streaming? On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:27 PM jjimeno wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe it has to do with this: > > Performance of Ignite as key-value datastore. C++ Thin

Re: [2.10 branch]cpp thin client transaction :Transaction with id 1 not found.

Thanks, I've a few more questions, just to be clear: 1. Are servers behind NAT or some kind of balancer, or do they have distinct static IP addresses? 2. Do you specify all servers addresses in cfg.SetEndPoints("X.X.X.X");, or only one? Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:47 AM

Re: Ignite thick client triggering PME in 2.8.0 ?

Even i observed the same, during thick client or visor joining cluster looks like something related to PME happens but not data rebalancing, and also it is putting some lock on WAL archive segment which never gets released and causing WAL disk running out of space. On Thu, 4 Feb, 2021, 4:59 pm

Re: Ignite thick client triggering PME in 2.8.0 ?

Hi, can anyone please check and respond on this..appreciate your help in advance -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Long transaction suspended

Hi all, I'm trying to commit a very large transaction (8M keys and ~4GB of data). After a while, I can see this diagnostics message in node log: [08:56:31,721][WARNING][sys-#989][diagnostic] >>> Transaction [startTime=08:55:22.095, curTime=08:56:31.712, ... *state=SUSPENDED* ... Does anyone

Re: putAll() performance big difference, 2.7.5 vs 2.9.1

Hi, Maybe it has to do with this: Performance of Ignite as key-value datastore. C++ Thin Client -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/