service is hosted.
Let me know if this makes sense or if you see any red flags.
Thanks,
Krish
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Is it possible to have a cluster topology where native persistence is enabled
only for one node and all other nodes use in-memory cache store *without
*native persistence?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
aphore = this.ignite.semaphore( "123" , 1 , true,
> true);
> boolean acquired = semaphore.tryAquire();
> if (acquired) {
> // run logic
>semaphore.release();
> }
> }
Thanks,
Krish
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
t will push the task
to the end of the queue and pick up the next job. What do you think about
this approach?
Thanks,
Krish
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
ilya.kasnacheev wrote
> This means that Ignite prioritizing is a poor fit for you and you may need
> to roll out your own, perhaps based on IgniteQueue.
Does ignite provide priority queue implementation of IgniteQueue interface?
Thanks,
Krish
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70
Thanks Stephen and Ilya,
As mentioned in job scheduling documentation, collisionAPI will take care of
job scheduling when jobs arrive at destination node. Lets say I use
PriorityQueueCollisionSpi and send three jobs with priorities 5, 7 and 10 to
one node, then that node will execute job with