Re: Error on Transactions with Write Behind

2016-05-06 Thread amitpa
Hey, It does work with READ_COMMITTED However, can you please let me know what is the expected release in which this fix will be included? -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Error-on-Transactions-with-Write-Behind-tp4736p4817.html Sent from

Re: Error on Transactions with Write Behind

2016-05-04 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
e lock won't be acquired on the 'get' operation as in case > 2. > > -- > Denis > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Error-on-Transactions-with-Write-Behind-tp4736p4764.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Error on Transactions with Write Behind

2016-05-04 Thread Denis Magda
this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Error-on-Transactions-with-Write-Behind-tp4736p4764.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Error on Transactions with Write Behind

2016-05-03 Thread amitpa
data, where as the second one is used for writing to the database asynchronously ). -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Error-on-Transactions-with-Write-Behind-tp4736p4749.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.