more or less what you said (even if
> > in this API we do not have to retrieve explicitely the base value).
> > Best regards,
> > Louis
> > --
> > *De :* Stephen Darlington
> > *Envoyé :* mardi 13 février 2024 11:22
> > *À :* user@ig
> *De :* Stephen Darlington
> *Envoyé :* mardi 13 février 2024 11:22
> *À :* user@ignite.apache.org
> *Objet :* Re: Question about REST/C++ client
>
> The easy answer to the "50 gets in parallel" is to use GetAll.
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 09:54, Ig
the base value).
Best regards,
Louis
De : Stephen Darlington
Envoyé : mardi 13 février 2024 11:22
À : user@ignite.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question about REST/C++ client
The easy answer to the "50 gets in parallel" is to use GetAll.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 0
The easy answer to the "50 gets in parallel" is to use GetAll.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 09:54, Igor Sapego wrote:
> 1. There is no such API. Seems like a weird error in documentation. We
> will fix it. If you want to make 50 gets in parallel, I think it's better
> to run 50 clients with the
1. There is no such API. Seems like a weird error in documentation. We will
fix it. If you want to make 50 gets in parallel, I think it's better to run
50 clients with the current API. You can use the same client too, but it
may be slower, depending on how many nodes you have in a cluster.
2. What
Hello,
I am trying to use/test Apache Ignite for a particular use case. For background
reference, my use case of Ignite is to do 100Ks (to begin with) of "Gets" and
of "increments" of values that will be stored in probably multiple caches in
Apache Ignite.
I read the Ignite documentation, but
