Re: [DISCUSS] Java 6 support

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:22:06PM +0200, Andrew Phillips wrote: > >Please give me until the end of June to gather some data and poll > >our customers. > > Should we send the same proposal out to user@ and solicit responses? I started this thread on user@ to solicit this exact feedback. Discussio

Re: Maginatics Cloud Storage Platform

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:00:52PM -0300, felipe gutierrez wrote: > Hi, > > I have a doubt about Maginatics Cloud Storage Platform. > > JClouds is a subproject of it? > > Can I use the platform for free? Where can I download? > > Thanks in advance! > Felipe Maginatics is one of the many vendor

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

Ignasi, As I impled earlier, it looks like it does work (I tested to be sure it worked for "ALL" and "PRIVATE" and did not work for "PUBLIC" in my setup). I was unaware of how the string-to-enum conversion worked, but Andrew indicated it was probably something in Guice, which was a good enoug

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

I've just tested the following code with 1.7.3 (with DigitalOcean, but the provider is not relevant): Properties overrides = new Properties(); overrides.setProperty(SOCKET_FINDER_ALLOWED_INTERFACES, "PRIVATE"); ComputeServiceContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("digitalocean") .credenti

Maginatics Cloud Storage Platform

Hi, I have a doubt about Maginatics Cloud Storage Platform. JClouds is a subproject of it? Can I use the platform for free? Where can I download? Thanks in advance! Felipe

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

If it is (which it seems to be), I'm good to go. I'm also guessing a bit here (we'll see what the experts have to say ;-)), but as far as I am aware, Guice is the one providing the string-to-enum conversion as part of it's out-of-the-box binding support [2]. [1] https://code.google.com/

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

Thanks for the quick reply, Andrew! I do think it's working... I've tried specifying "PUBLIC" (which I've made impossible via firewall) and it (correctly) times out on me, so it is behaving as expected. It's just more of a black box to me as to why it is! Unfortunately, I am unable to impor

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

I've tried the following: overrides.setProperty(SOCKET_FINDER_ALLOWED_INTERFACES, "PRIVATE"); That looks correct to me, Dan. If the conversion from a string is not working (it may only work as a string if set via a -D property on the command line? I'm not sure), you may want to import org

Re: Specifying only public or private IP for RunScriptOnNode

Ignasi, Thanks so much for putting that fix in for 1.7.3. I've updated my jclouds dependencies and am trying to update my source to access the new feature. Unfortunately I'm (possibly) stuck in interpreting the API. Reading the Javadoc [1], I note the allowed interfaces for the property ar

Re: Clojure support

I am up totally up for it as well. I have wanted to work with Clojure for the past couple of years. There may be some good synergy with Toni being in the same office building here. :) /jd From: Ignasi Barrera mailto:n...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "user@jclouds.apache.org

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

thanks andrew I will try to move to jclouds 1.7 and take it from there... on that note is there a jclouds repo with the openstack labs project merged into latest (or one of the latest) jclouds 1.7? On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Inbar Stolberg wrote: > thanks andrew I will try to move to jclou

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-558 - JSON parse error on createNodesInGroup

Hi. I have a remark about this bug : In OpenStack, when creating a server, the "image" is not always mandatory. For example, when creating a server to be booted via PXE boot, Openstack "create" server expects "block_device_mapping" and does not expect and image. When creating a server this way via