Re: Karaf 4.1?

Hi Scott, I'm updating website this morning (I finalized the release while on vacation with a limited Internet connection ;)). By the way 4.1.1 should be out in 3 weeks. Regards JB On 02/22/2017 11:05 PM, Leschke, Scott wrote: /I was wondering. I’ve just been periodically taking a peek at

RE: Karaf 4.1?

I was wondering. I’ve just been periodically taking a peek at http://karaf.apache.org/download.html as it’s been my experience in the past that this gets updated pretty much right away. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Karaf 4.1?

4.1.0 is already out. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.1.0/ On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:42 PM Leschke, Scott wrote: > Are we looking at a release of 4.1 soon? I realize it’s sort of a “it’ll > be done when it’s done” situation but I’ve seen a

Karaf 4.1?

Are we looking at a release of 4.1 soon? I realize it's sort of a "it'll be done when it's done" situation but I've seen a number of people mention it recently but since the download page isn't showing it I assume they're using a snapshot. The tone of the recent discussion leads me to believe

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Great ! Thanks Regards JB On 02/22/2017 11:34 AM, Olivier21 wrote: JB, I sent you the project by email. -- View this message in context:

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

JB, I sent you the project by email. -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049609.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Any chance to share your project ? It would be easier as I can fix directly on your stuff. Thanks, Regards JB On 02/22/2017 11:14 AM, Olivier21 wrote: Hi JB! In fact, I have a maven module to generate my custom distribution of Karaf and the pom.xml is : http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Hi JB! In fact, I have a maven module to generate my custom distribution of Karaf and the pom.xml is : http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;>

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Hi Olivier, In your command, I guess you have @Reference to KarService, correct ? Regards JB On 02/22/2017 11:05 AM, Olivier21 wrote: bundle:list -t 0 give me this result : karaf@root()> bundle:list -t 0 START LEVEL 100 , List Threshold: 0 ID | State| Lvl | Version | Name

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

bundle:list -t 0 give me this result : karaf@root()> bundle:list -t 0 START LEVEL 100 , List Threshold: 0 ID | State| Lvl | Version | Name 0 | Active | 0 | 5.6.1| System Bundle

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Just a quick detail: as the default system level is 80, bundle:list will show only bundles greater than 80 (considered as user bundles). The 'la' command (bundle:list -t 0) displays all bundles (system and user). Regards JB On 02/22/2017 10:55 AM, Olivier21 wrote: Thank you very much

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Hi Olivier, Can you check with la command (it's an alias to bundle:list -t 0) ? Regards JB On 02/22/2017 10:55 AM, Olivier21 wrote: Thank you very much Christian. I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved regarding LogService. I have no more the error message.

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

I do not see any error in the log. Can you try bundle:list -t 0 ? Christian On 22.02.2017 10:55, Olivier21 wrote: Thank you very much Christian. I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved regarding LogService. I have no more the error message. Nevertheless, when i

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Thank you very much Christian. I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved regarding LogService. I have no more the error message. Nevertheless, when i execute the command "bundle:list", I have no result. In the log file, i have 2 missing dependencies (that I have

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Actually it's not really a bug in Pax-Logging, as the feature.xml is provided by Karaf. And it's easy to fix for us, cause we just need to add this capability to the feature.xml of the pax-logging feature we have in Karaf. we just need to add the following snippet to the feature.xml

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Ok Thanks Tim! -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049599.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

As Tim explained your bundle has the requirement for a LogService OSGi service in its Manifest. Since I think karaf 4.0.5 requirements for services are also checked by the feature service of karaf. In version before these requirements were ignored. The problem now is that not all bundles that

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

For this next step you’ll need someone more familiar with how Karaf adds its logging service in the “normal” distribution. Best Regards, Tim > On 22 Feb 2017, at 09:22, Olivier21 wrote: > > Tim, > > Thank you for your answer. > > I discovered with the

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Tim, Thank you for your answer. I discovered with the command : service:list LogService that the bundle OPS4J Pax-Logging provides the log service : karaf@root()> service:list LogService [org.apache.karaf.log.core.LogService] -- service.bundleid = 37

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

I forgot to say that in the file blueprint.xml, I have : -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049594.html Sent from the Karaf - User

Re: missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

The missing requirement indicates that you need a Log Service implementation (i.e. someone to provide you with the service). The dependency that you’re compiling against is just the API (which is a good thing to compile against) but you actually need an implementation at runtime. Your build

missing requirement [...] osgi.service; effective:=active; filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService)"

Hello, I developed a SOAP service which is encapsulated in a kar archive. Then, I made a custom karaf distribution from Karaf 4.0.4. Everything works fine (no error message in the log files and the service works fine). The problem is when I try to do the same thing with Karaf 4.0.8, I got this