Re: Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-21 Thread Scott Lewis
Just FYI:  ECF's impl of OSGi R7 Remote Services has a CXF [1] as Karaf features. This uses only Jax-RS 2  annotations rather than the OSGI annotations, and since OSGi spec'd works seamlessly with DS. There's a tutorial here [2] that uses either Jersey or CXF.   Of course any existing

Re: Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-21 Thread Ryan Moquin
Yes, it's an impressive accomplishment, I hope I didn't come off the wrong way with my questions. I wanted to figure out how the JAX-RS whiteboard stuff might play together with the CXF REST services I already have. I'll make sure to ask any further questions in the Aries list. Ryan On Wed,

Re: Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-19 Thread Tim Ward
Yes, we’re really proud of the JAX-RS whiteboard - particularly when you can use it with the DS 1.4 Component Property annotations. It’s brilliantly simple to use. All the best, Tim > On 19 Jun 2019, at 14:32, Ryan Moquin wrote: > > Yes, you are correct Tim. I forgot there is an Aries

Re: Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-19 Thread Ryan Moquin
Yes, you are correct Tim. I forgot there is an Aries list, my bad! Thank you for the explanation Tim, that makes perfect sense to me :) It's pretty cool to be able to whip up some jaxrs classes without the extra boiler plate. Ryan On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:30 AM Timothy Ward wrote: > Hi, >

Re: Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-17 Thread Timothy Ward
Hi, I feel that the best place to ask this question would be the Apache Aries mail list (given that it’s an Aries project). I’m therefore cross posting this back to the Aries list. In general repackaging a library is intended to shield users from the underlying implementation details. In the

Aries JAXRS whiteboard question

2019-06-16 Thread Ryan Moquin
I was looking at the Aries JAXRS whiteboard example to see how it differs from just using CXF directly. It looks interesting. My one main concern would be around the Aries whiteboard bundle needing to repackage cxf dependencies. Could that be a hinderance around CXF version upgrades when used