Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-09 Thread Steinar Bang
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > yes, the docker image is arm based. I'm adding multi-arch image > support (to have x86 images as well). > I will upload new images soon. Great! Thanks, JB!

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-09 Thread Steinar Bang
> Francois Papon : > It means that your docker image is not immutable and after starting > the Karaf instance, it will download the updated dependencies features > at startup right? Correct! :-) > It's not the common design for docker image and I think it's better to > have a custom Karaf

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, yes, the docker image is arm based. I'm adding multi-arch image support (to have x86 images as well). I will upload new images soon. Regards JB On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:36 PM Steinar Bang wrote: > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Hi Steinar > > Let me check about the image type. > >

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-08 Thread Francois Papon
It means that your docker image is not immutable and after starting the Karaf instance, it will download the updated dependencies features at startup right? It's not the common design for docker image and I think it's better to have a custom Karaf distribution and build a new docker image

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-08 Thread Steinar Bang
> Francois Papon : > Why not using Jib? > https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/tree/master Unless I'm very mistaken that doesn't do what I want to do. Jib looks like it is for containering a Java application? What I'm doing is something different: 1. I start out with a standard

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-08 Thread Francois Papon
Hi, Why not using Jib? https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/tree/master regards, François On 08/01/2024 19:36, Steinar Bang wrote: Jean-Baptiste Onofré : Hi Steinar Let me check about the image type. Did you find out anything? The docker-maven-plugin I've been using (the one

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2024-01-08 Thread Steinar Bang
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi Steinar > Let me check about the image type. Did you find out anything? The docker-maven-plugin I've been using (the one created by spotify), was abandoned a couple of years back: https://github.com/spotify/docker-maven-plugin So I've been trying to to use a

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2023-12-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Steinar Let me check about the image type. Regards JB On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 5:44 PM Steinar Bang wrote: > > > Steinar Bang : > [snip!] > > Or try out the, completely different, docker-maven-plugin that comes up > > first on google searches? > >

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2023-12-22 Thread Steinar Bang
> Steinar Bang : [snip!] > Or try out the, completely different, docker-maven-plugin that comes up > first on google searches? > https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-plugin > I guess try out the new one. Not much luck with the new one, so far:

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2023-12-22 Thread Steinar Bang
I just noticed that I'm using an archived and dead docker-maven-plugin https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector/blob/b0d6cedb35648df11ef1554b9fb8fbe669e94640/docker/pom.xml#L32 https://github.com/spotify/docker-maven-plugin?tab=readme-ov-file Archived on March 21 2022 and last commit from

Re: Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2023-12-21 Thread Steinar Bang
FWIW The reason that I'm trying to update sonar-collector's docker image is that I discovered that sonar-collector actually has a user, and that user uses the docker image which suddenly stopped working: https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector/issues/5 The way I've created the docker image

Is the karaf 4.4.4 docker image arm only?

2023-12-20 Thread Steinar Bang
I'm trying to build an updated docker image for my sonar-collector project, based on the official karaf 4.4.4 image: https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector However even though I'm building the docker image on an amd64 debian 12.4 "bookworm" system, the resulting docker image seems to be an