So, it's like saying:
We know DOSGI implements RPC with REST-ful services, so we exploit that in
order to create some rest webservices. Then, instead of query them from
another OSGi container, we directly query them from the browser.
Is my understanding correct?
2017-10-24 6:29 GMT+02:00
Correct.
Regards
JB
On 10/24/2017 11:19 AM, Massimo Bono wrote:
In that case the user wouldn't interact with the browser, but with a client
embedded inside the OSGi application itself, correct?
2017-10-24 9:44 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré >:
Or a remote instance can "ship" a client interacting with a remote REST service
exposed from an OSGi service.
Regards
JB
On 10/24/2017 09:24 AM, Massimo Bono wrote:
So, it's like saying:
We know DOSGI implements RPC with REST-ful services, so we exploit that in order
to create some rest
Hey Everyone,
I currently work on a custom karaf distribution (based on 4.1.2) built using
the karaf-maven-plugin. This distribution was working perfectly offline (any
nexus server) until I added a non OSGi jar file inside one of our custom karaf
feature using the wrap:mvn protocol.
In that case the user wouldn't interact with the browser, but with a client
embedded inside the OSGi application itself, correct?
2017-10-24 9:44 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Or a remote instance can "ship" a client interacting with a remote REST
> service exposed from
Hi,
if I understand your use case correctly, you want to add "wrap" to
"installedFeature".
https://karaf.apache.org/manual/latest/#_plugin_configuration
2017-10-24 11:03 GMT+02:00 DERIES Sebastien :
> Hey Everyone,
>
>
>
> I currently work on a custom karaf
You are welcome ;)
Happy to help. Let me know if you need any more details.
Regards
JB
On 10/24/2017 04:17 PM, Massimo Bono wrote:
Ok, now my doubt has been cleared out.
Thank you!
2017-10-24 12:09 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré >:
Ok, now my doubt has been cleared out.
Thank you!
2017-10-24 12:09 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Correct.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/24/2017 11:19 AM, Massimo Bono wrote:
>
>> In that case the user wouldn't interact with the browser, but with a
>> client embedded inside
It's clear for me too now, I can choose the right solution :)
Thanks !
Le 24/10/2017 à 18:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> You are welcome ;)
>
> Happy to help. Let me know if you need any more details.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/24/2017 04:17 PM, Massimo Bono wrote:
>> Ok, now my doubt has