Re: features-maven-plugin fails to download smooks dependencies

2013-06-13 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
Hi, Your answer was quite shocking :D but after giving it a thought it started to make sense. I was miss-leaded by the fact that smooks dependencies are different from the the smooks feature. Although I've seen them both this fact some how escaped me. You've managed to restore my 'zen' state :).

Re: Features XSD

2013-06-13 Thread lichtin
Thanks. This reminds me about KARAF-576. Any reason this change (ffang: adding start-level attribute) never made it? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1094981 jbonofre wrote Hi Martin, Good catch, I will deploy the schema there. Regards JB On 06/10/2013 10:18 PM,

Re: eik on eclipse juno/4.2?

2013-06-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Mike, we created dedicated branches in the past, but agree it doesn't make so sense. I would prefer to keep 0.9.0 with Eclipse 4.1 and upgrade trunk (so next 0.10.0) *only* Eclipse 4.2. For Eclipse 4.3, I didn't yet take a look, but I don't think it will require so much changes. I

Re: Features XSD

2013-06-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, no sure to follow you. start-level attribute is supported on feature (we already use it). Regards JB On 06/13/2013 10:46 AM, lichtin wrote: Thanks. This reminds me about KARAF-576. Any reason this change (ffang: adding start-level attribute) never made it?

Re: Log4J v2

2013-06-13 Thread Andreas Pieber
Hey, The question would rather be: Does pax-logging support log4jv2 and AFAIK the answer is no. The question would be: how difficult can it be to add log4j v2 support to pax-logging :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, CLEMENT Jean-Philippe

RE: Log4J v2

2013-06-13 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
Thanks for the info. Is PAX logging part of Felix ? JP [@@ OPEN @@] De : Andreas Pieber [mailto:anpie...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 13 juin 2013 15:56 À : Apache Karaf Objet : Re: Log4J v2 Hey, The question would rather be: Does pax-logging support log4jv2 and AFAIK the answer is no. The

Log4J v2

2013-06-13 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
Dear Karaf Team, I would like to know if Karaf (v3) supports Log4J v2? Cheers, JP [@@ OPEN @@]

Re: Log4J v2

2013-06-13 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi, no it's not. https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxlogging/Pax+Logging regards, Achim 2013/6/13 CLEMENT Jean-Philippe jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com Thanks for the info. ** ** Is PAX logging part of Felix ? ** ** JP ** ** [@@ OPEN @@] ** ** *De

RE: eik on eclipse juno/4.2?

2013-06-13 Thread Mike Wilson
Thanks Jean-Baptiste, I was wondering whether to go for http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/eik/downloads/detail?name=eik-jun o-0.5-201210141349-snapshot.zipcan=2q= on the old site, or get current trunk, but then I'll wait for you to prepare 0.10.0 instead! Best regards Mike

integration test, startup time for karaf 2.3.1

2013-06-13 Thread Marcos Mendez
Hi, I'm trying to improve the startup time for our integration tests. I'm using the vanilla maven distribution zip, the exam tooling, and cut down the featuresBoot to config. Is there anything else I can do to cut down the startup time? It's taking around 20-30s to start with no additional

Re: integration test, startup time for karaf 2.3.1

2013-06-13 Thread Andreas Pieber
Do you reference the apache karaf artifact in your pom files? This is the only problem I can imagine making plain karaf tests so slow for you. If you dont enter the karaf distribution in your pom file as a dependency the test framework doesnt copy it into your .m2 directory and therefore