Hi,
Your answer was quite shocking :D but after giving it a thought it
started to make sense. I was miss-leaded by the fact that smooks
dependencies are different from the the smooks feature. Although I've
seen them both this fact some how escaped me.
You've managed to restore my 'zen' state :).
Thanks.
This reminds me about KARAF-576.
Any reason this change (ffang: adding start-level attribute) never made it?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1094981
jbonofre wrote
Hi Martin,
Good catch, I will deploy the schema there.
Regards
JB
On 06/10/2013 10:18 PM,
Hi Mike,
we created dedicated branches in the past, but agree it doesn't make so
sense.
I would prefer to keep 0.9.0 with Eclipse 4.1 and upgrade trunk (so next
0.10.0) *only* Eclipse 4.2.
For Eclipse 4.3, I didn't yet take a look, but I don't think it will
require so much changes.
I
Hi,
no sure to follow you. start-level attribute is supported on feature (we
already use it).
Regards
JB
On 06/13/2013 10:46 AM, lichtin wrote:
Thanks.
This reminds me about KARAF-576.
Any reason this change (ffang: adding start-level attribute) never made it?
Hey,
The question would rather be:
Does pax-logging support log4jv2 and AFAIK the answer is no. The question
would be: how difficult can it be to add log4j v2 support to pax-logging :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
Thanks for the info.
Is PAX logging part of Felix ?
JP
[@@ OPEN @@]
De : Andreas Pieber [mailto:anpie...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 13 juin 2013 15:56
À : Apache Karaf
Objet : Re: Log4J v2
Hey,
The question would rather be:
Does pax-logging support log4jv2 and AFAIK the answer is no. The
Dear Karaf Team,
I would like to know if Karaf (v3) supports Log4J v2?
Cheers,
JP
[@@ OPEN @@]
Hi,
no it's not.
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxlogging/Pax+Logging
regards, Achim
2013/6/13 CLEMENT Jean-Philippe jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com
Thanks for the info.
** **
Is PAX logging part of Felix ?
** **
JP
** **
[@@ OPEN @@]
** **
*De
Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
I was wondering whether to go for
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/eik/downloads/detail?name=eik-jun
o-0.5-201210141349-snapshot.zipcan=2q=
on the old site, or get current trunk, but then I'll wait for you
to prepare 0.10.0 instead!
Best regards
Mike
Hi,
I'm trying to improve the startup time for our integration tests. I'm using the
vanilla maven distribution zip, the exam tooling, and cut down the featuresBoot
to config. Is there anything else I can do to cut down the startup time? It's
taking around 20-30s to start with no additional
Do you reference the apache karaf artifact in your pom files? This is the
only problem I can imagine making plain karaf tests so slow for you. If
you dont enter the karaf distribution in your pom file as a dependency the
test framework doesnt copy it into your .m2 directory and therefore
11 matches
Mail list logo